[OpenSIPS-Users] usrloc full-sharing cluster doesn't replicate contacts cflags
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
bogdan at opensips.org
Wed Nov 6 11:20:17 UTC 2024
Hi Michael,
Strange I would say. Could you get me a pcap capturing the BIN traffic
(normally the 5555 tcp port) to see what exactly is replicated? Of
course, please send it off-list :).
Regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
https://www.opensips-solutions.com
https://www.siphub.com
On 06.11.2024 01:38, Michael Ulitskiy wrote:
>
> Hello Bogdan,
>
> Config is very similar. Mostly things specific to local machine are
> different (ip address, hostname, etc). "NAT_BFLAG" is the only branch
> flag used. Registrar does 'save("domain")'.
>
> I worked around it by adding "nat=yes" to registrar's "attr_avp",
> which seems to be replicated just fine, but sure, it's better to have
> cflags replicated as they should.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Michael
>
>
> On 11/5/24 10:26, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
>> Hi Michael,
>>
>> Do you have identical cfg's on both servers? The replication of the
>> contact-flags is definitely in place. But if you have different cfg's
>> with different flags used, their mapping (string to idx) may differ
>> on the 2 servers, so the set of idx's replicated by the first machine
>> may have 0 meaning for the second one.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>>
>> OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
>> https://www.opensips-solutions.com
>> https://www.siphub.com
>> On 01.11.2024 00:16, Michael Ulitskiy wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> To my surprise I've noticed that opensips location cluster
>>> (full-sharing,active/backup) doesn't replicate contacts cflags.
>>>
>>> Active server:
>>>
>>> {
>>> "AOR": "xyz011101",
>>> "Contacts": [
>>> {
>>> "Contact": "sip:xyz011101 at 192.168.0.190:1026",
>>> "ContactID": "3246532381380717115",
>>> "Expires": 53,
>>> "Q": "",
>>> "Callid": "5be2b61175573914d242ab6f79392a76",
>>> "Cseq": 88,
>>> "User-agent": "PolycomVVX-VVX_150-UA/5.9.2.3446",
>>> "Received": "sip:x.x.80.8:1026",
>>> "State": "CS_NEW",
>>> "Flags": 0,
>>> "Cflags": "NAT_BFLAG",
>>> "Socket": "udp:x.x.80.228:5060",
>>> "Methods": 8063,
>>> "Attr": "company_id=2;station_family_id=2;station_id=394;"
>>> }
>>> ]
>>> }
>>>
>>> Backup server:
>>>
>>> {
>>> "AOR": "xyz011101",
>>> "Contacts": [
>>> {
>>> "Contact": "sip:xyz011101 at 192.168.0.190:1026",
>>> "ContactID": "3246532381380717115",
>>> "Expires": 46,
>>> "Q": "",
>>> "Callid": "5be2b61175573914d242ab6f79392a76",
>>> "Cseq": 88,
>>> "User-agent": "PolycomVVX-VVX_150-UA/5.9.2.3446",
>>> "Received": "sip:x.x.80.8:1026",
>>> "State": "CS_NEW",
>>> "Flags": 0,
>>> "Cflags": "",
>>> "Socket": "udp:x.x.80.228:5060",
>>> "Methods": 8063,
>>> "Attr": "company_id=2;station_family_id=2;station_id=394;"
>>> }
>>> ]
>>> }
>>>
>>> Looks like everything is replicated by cflags. Am I missing
>>> something? Is it an oversight?
>>>
>>> root at csptest-p1n1:~# /usr/local/opensips3/sbin/opensips -V
>>> version: opensips 3.4.9 (x86_64/linux)
>>> flags: STATS: On, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC,
>>> Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, HP_MALLOC, DBG_MALLOC, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WA
>>> IT
>>> ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN
>>> 16, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535
>>> poll method support: poll, epoll, sigio_rt, select.
>>> git revision: cd02af8d9
>>> main.c compiled on 14:36:42 Oct 31 2024 with gcc 5.5.0
>>>
>>> Config:
>>>
>>> #### Clusterer Module
>>> loadmodule "clusterer.so"
>>> modparam("clusterer", "my_node_id", 1)
>>> modparam("clusterer", "db_mode", 0)
>>> modparam("clusterer", "sharing_tag", "status/1=active")
>>> modparam("clusterer", "seed_fallback_interval", 10)
>>> modparam("clusterer", "my_node_info", "cluster_id=1,
>>> url=bin:x.x.80.226:5555, flags=seed")
>>> modparam("clusterer", "neighbor_node_info",
>>> "cluster_id=1,node_id=2,url=bin:x.x.80.227:5555")
>>>
>>> #### USeR LOCation module
>>> loadmodule "usrloc.so"
>>> modparam("usrloc", "nat_bflag", "NAT_BFLAG") #NAT bflag saved in
>>> usrloc, used to indicate nat
>>> modparam("usrloc", "desc_time_order", 1) #location records
>>> are kept timestamp ordered. most recent 1st
>>> modparam("usrloc", "cseq_delay", 10)
>>> modparam("usrloc", "hash_size", 14)
>>> #2^14 - 16356 hash entries
>>> modparam("usrloc", "location_cluster", 1)
>>> modparam("usrloc", "cluster_mode","full-sharing")
>>> modparam("usrloc", "working_mode_preset", "full-sharing-cluster")
>>>
>>>
>>> Any ideas? Thanks,
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Michael Ulitskiy*
>>> Ace Innovative Networks, Inc.
>>> https://www.aceinnovative.com
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Users mailing list
>>> Users at lists.opensips.org
>>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20241106/3e06b403/attachment.html>
More information about the Users
mailing list