[OpenSIPS-Users] usrloc full-sharing cluster doesn't replicate contacts cflags
Michael Ulitskiy
mulitskiy at acedsl.com
Mon Nov 11 22:20:24 UTC 2024
It works now. Thanks a lot!
*Michael Ulitskiy*
Ace Innovative Networks, Inc.
Main/SMS: 212-868-2366
Direct/SMS: 212-812-1203
https://www.aceinnovative.com
On 11/11/24 04:43, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> Liviu pushed on master a potential fix (see [1]). I still think there
> is some mismatch between the 2 scripts you have, nevertheless the
> replication should not be affected - and here is the fix Liviu did.
> Could you try with it and see if it solves your problem ?
>
> [1]
> https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/ee8b3a26f34ef4540b21691577423f545714fc7d
>
> Best regards,
> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>
> OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
> https://www.opensips-solutions.com
> https://www.siphub.com
> On 06.11.2024 17:58, Michael Ulitskiy wrote:
>>
>> Hi Bogdan,
>>
>> Attached is capture of traffic on port 5555. While it was running I
>> restarted backup opensips running at 66.114.80.227 and waited for
>> registration cycle of endpoint 'xyz011101'. Usrloc dump still shows
>> that cflags are not replicated.
>>
>> Active server at 66.114.80.226:
>>
>> {
>> "AOR": "xyz011101",
>> "Contacts": [
>> {
>> "Contact": "sip:xyz011101 at 192.168.0.190:1026",
>> "ContactID": "3246532381380715253",
>> "Expires": 50,
>> "Q": "",
>> "Callid": "bcab86e5a838513dd934c35ee9392a76",
>> "Cseq": 8,
>> "User-agent": "PolycomVVX-VVX_150-UA/5.9.2.3446",
>> "Received": "sip:66.114.80.8:1026",
>> "State": "CS_NEW",
>> "Flags": 0,
>> "Cflags": "NAT_BFLAG",
>> "Socket": "udp:66.114.80.228:5060",
>> "Methods": 8063,
>> "Attr":
>> "company_id=2;station_family_id=2;station_id=394;nat=yes;"
>> }
>> ]
>> }
>>
>> Backup server at 66.114.80.227:
>>
>> {
>> "AOR": "xyz011101",
>> "Contacts": [
>> {
>> "Contact": "sip:xyz011101 at 192.168.0.190:1026",
>> "ContactID": "3246532381380715253",
>> "Expires": 48,
>> "Q": "",
>> "Callid": "bcab86e5a838513dd934c35ee9392a76",
>> "Cseq": 8,
>> "User-agent": "PolycomVVX-VVX_150-UA/5.9.2.3446",
>> "Received": "sip:66.114.80.8:1026",
>> "State": "CS_NEW",
>> "Flags": 0,
>> "Cflags": "",
>> "Socket": "udp:66.114.80.228:5060",
>> "Methods": 8063,
>> "Attr":
>> "company_id=2;station_family_id=2;station_id=394;nat=yes;"
>> }
>> ]
>> }
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> *Michael Ulitskiy*
>> Ace Innovative Networks, Inc.
>> Main/SMS: 212-868-2366
>> Direct/SMS: 212-812-1203
>> https://www.aceinnovative.com
>> On 11/6/24 06:20, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
>>> Hi Michael,
>>>
>>> Strange I would say. Could you get me a pcap capturing the BIN
>>> traffic (normally the 5555 tcp port) to see what exactly is
>>> replicated? Of course, please send it off-list :).
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>>>
>>> OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
>>> https://www.opensips-solutions.com
>>> https://www.siphub.com
>>> On 06.11.2024 01:38, Michael Ulitskiy wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hello Bogdan,
>>>>
>>>> Config is very similar. Mostly things specific to local machine are
>>>> different (ip address, hostname, etc). "NAT_BFLAG" is the only
>>>> branch flag used. Registrar does 'save("domain")'.
>>>>
>>>> I worked around it by adding "nat=yes" to registrar's "attr_avp",
>>>> which seems to be replicated just fine, but sure, it's better to
>>>> have cflags replicated as they should.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Michael
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 11/5/24 10:26, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
>>>>> Hi Michael,
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you have identical cfg's on both servers? The replication of
>>>>> the contact-flags is definitely in place. But if you have
>>>>> different cfg's with different flags used, their mapping (string
>>>>> to idx) may differ on the 2 servers, so the set of idx's
>>>>> replicated by the first machine may have 0 meaning for the second one.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>>>>>
>>>>> OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
>>>>> https://www.opensips-solutions.com
>>>>> https://www.siphub.com
>>>>> On 01.11.2024 00:16, Michael Ulitskiy wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To my surprise I've noticed that opensips location cluster
>>>>>> (full-sharing,active/backup) doesn't replicate contacts cflags.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Active server:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> "AOR": "xyz011101",
>>>>>> "Contacts": [
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> "Contact": "sip:xyz011101 at 192.168.0.190:1026",
>>>>>> "ContactID": "3246532381380717115",
>>>>>> "Expires": 53,
>>>>>> "Q": "",
>>>>>> "Callid": "5be2b61175573914d242ab6f79392a76",
>>>>>> "Cseq": 88,
>>>>>> "User-agent": "PolycomVVX-VVX_150-UA/5.9.2.3446",
>>>>>> "Received": "sip:x.x.80.8:1026",
>>>>>> "State": "CS_NEW",
>>>>>> "Flags": 0,
>>>>>> "Cflags": "NAT_BFLAG",
>>>>>> "Socket": "udp:x.x.80.228:5060",
>>>>>> "Methods": 8063,
>>>>>> "Attr":
>>>>>> "company_id=2;station_family_id=2;station_id=394;"
>>>>>> }
>>>>>> ]
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Backup server:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> "AOR": "xyz011101",
>>>>>> "Contacts": [
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> "Contact": "sip:xyz011101 at 192.168.0.190:1026",
>>>>>> "ContactID": "3246532381380717115",
>>>>>> "Expires": 46,
>>>>>> "Q": "",
>>>>>> "Callid": "5be2b61175573914d242ab6f79392a76",
>>>>>> "Cseq": 88,
>>>>>> "User-agent": "PolycomVVX-VVX_150-UA/5.9.2.3446",
>>>>>> "Received": "sip:x.x.80.8:1026",
>>>>>> "State": "CS_NEW",
>>>>>> "Flags": 0,
>>>>>> "Cflags": "",
>>>>>> "Socket": "udp:x.x.80.228:5060",
>>>>>> "Methods": 8063,
>>>>>> "Attr":
>>>>>> "company_id=2;station_family_id=2;station_id=394;"
>>>>>> }
>>>>>> ]
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Looks like everything is replicated by cflags. Am I missing
>>>>>> something? Is it an oversight?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> root at csptest-p1n1:~# /usr/local/opensips3/sbin/opensips -V
>>>>>> version: opensips 3.4.9 (x86_64/linux)
>>>>>> flags: STATS: On, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC,
>>>>>> Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, HP_MALLOC, DBG_MALLOC, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WA
>>>>>> IT
>>>>>> ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN
>>>>>> 16, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535
>>>>>> poll method support: poll, epoll, sigio_rt, select.
>>>>>> git revision: cd02af8d9
>>>>>> main.c compiled on 14:36:42 Oct 31 2024 with gcc 5.5.0
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Config:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> #### Clusterer Module
>>>>>> loadmodule "clusterer.so"
>>>>>> modparam("clusterer", "my_node_id", 1)
>>>>>> modparam("clusterer", "db_mode", 0)
>>>>>> modparam("clusterer", "sharing_tag", "status/1=active")
>>>>>> modparam("clusterer", "seed_fallback_interval", 10)
>>>>>> modparam("clusterer", "my_node_info", "cluster_id=1,
>>>>>> url=bin:x.x.80.226:5555, flags=seed")
>>>>>> modparam("clusterer", "neighbor_node_info",
>>>>>> "cluster_id=1,node_id=2,url=bin:x.x.80.227:5555")
>>>>>>
>>>>>> #### USeR LOCation module
>>>>>> loadmodule "usrloc.so"
>>>>>> modparam("usrloc", "nat_bflag", "NAT_BFLAG") #NAT bflag saved
>>>>>> in usrloc, used to indicate nat
>>>>>> modparam("usrloc", "desc_time_order", 1) #location records
>>>>>> are kept timestamp ordered. most recent 1st
>>>>>> modparam("usrloc", "cseq_delay", 10)
>>>>>> modparam("usrloc", "hash_size", 14)
>>>>>> #2^14 - 16356 hash
>>>>>> entries
>>>>>> modparam("usrloc", "location_cluster", 1)
>>>>>> modparam("usrloc", "cluster_mode","full-sharing")
>>>>>> modparam("usrloc", "working_mode_preset", "full-sharing-cluster")
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any ideas? Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> *Michael Ulitskiy*
>>>>>> Ace Innovative Networks, Inc.
>>>>>> https://www.aceinnovative.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Users mailing list
>>>>>> Users at lists.opensips.org
>>>>>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>>
>>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20241111/dfcf4650/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Users
mailing list