[OpenSIPS-Users] usrloc full-sharing cluster doesn't replicate contacts cflags

[Michael Ulitskiy]

Hello Bogdan,

Config is very similar. Mostly things specific to local machine are 
different (ip address, hostname, etc). "NAT_BFLAG" is the only branch 
flag used. Registrar does  'save("domain")'.

I worked around it by adding "nat=yes" to registrar's "attr_avp", which 
seems to be replicated just fine, but sure, it's better to have cflags 
replicated as they should.

Thanks,

Michael


On 11/5/24 10:26, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> Do you have identical cfg's on both servers? The replication of the 
> contact-flags is definitely in place. But if you have different cfg's 
> with different flags used, their mapping (string to idx) may differ on 
> the 2 servers, so the set of idx's replicated by the first machine may 
> have 0 meaning for the second one.
>
> Best regards,
> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>
> OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
>    https://www.opensips-solutions.com
>    https://www.siphub.com
> On 01.11.2024 00:16, Michael Ulitskiy wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> To my surprise I've noticed that opensips location cluster 
>> (full-sharing,active/backup) doesn't replicate contacts cflags.
>>
>> Active server:
>>
>> {
>>    "AOR": "xyz011101",
>>    "Contacts": [
>>        {
>>            "Contact": "sip:xyz011101 at 192.168.0.190:1026",
>>            "ContactID": "3246532381380717115",
>>            "Expires": 53,
>>            "Q": "",
>>            "Callid": "5be2b61175573914d242ab6f79392a76",
>>            "Cseq": 88,
>>            "User-agent": "PolycomVVX-VVX_150-UA/5.9.2.3446",
>>            "Received": "sip:x.x.80.8:1026",
>>            "State": "CS_NEW",
>>            "Flags": 0,
>>            "Cflags": "NAT_BFLAG",
>>            "Socket": "udp:x.x.80.228:5060",
>>            "Methods": 8063,
>>            "Attr": "company_id=2;station_family_id=2;station_id=394;"
>>        }
>>    ]
>> }
>>
>> Backup server:
>>
>> {
>>    "AOR": "xyz011101",
>>    "Contacts": [
>>        {
>>            "Contact": "sip:xyz011101 at 192.168.0.190:1026",
>>            "ContactID": "3246532381380717115",
>>            "Expires": 46,
>>            "Q": "",
>>            "Callid": "5be2b61175573914d242ab6f79392a76",
>>            "Cseq": 88,
>>            "User-agent": "PolycomVVX-VVX_150-UA/5.9.2.3446",
>>            "Received": "sip:x.x.80.8:1026",
>>            "State": "CS_NEW",
>>            "Flags": 0,
>>            "Cflags": "",
>>            "Socket": "udp:x.x.80.228:5060",
>>            "Methods": 8063,
>>            "Attr": "company_id=2;station_family_id=2;station_id=394;"
>>        }
>>    ]
>> }
>>
>> Looks like everything is replicated by cflags. Am I missing 
>> something? Is it an oversight?
>>
>> root at csptest-p1n1:~# /usr/local/opensips3/sbin/opensips -V
>> version: opensips 3.4.9 (x86_64/linux)
>> flags: STATS: On, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, 
>> Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, HP_MALLOC, DBG_MALLOC, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WA
>> IT
>> ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16, 
>> MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535
>> poll method support: poll, epoll, sigio_rt, select.
>> git revision: cd02af8d9
>> main.c compiled on 14:36:42 Oct 31 2024 with gcc 5.5.0
>>
>> Config:
>>
>> #### Clusterer Module
>> loadmodule "clusterer.so"
>> modparam("clusterer", "my_node_id", 1)
>> modparam("clusterer", "db_mode", 0)
>> modparam("clusterer", "sharing_tag", "status/1=active")
>> modparam("clusterer", "seed_fallback_interval", 10)
>> modparam("clusterer", "my_node_info", "cluster_id=1, 
>> url=bin:x.x.80.226:5555, flags=seed")
>> modparam("clusterer", "neighbor_node_info", 
>> "cluster_id=1,node_id=2,url=bin:x.x.80.227:5555")
>>
>> #### USeR LOCation module
>> loadmodule "usrloc.so"
>> modparam("usrloc", "nat_bflag", "NAT_BFLAG")    #NAT bflag saved in 
>> usrloc, used to indicate nat
>> modparam("usrloc", "desc_time_order", 1)        #location records are 
>> kept timestamp ordered. most recent 1st
>> modparam("usrloc", "cseq_delay", 10)
>> modparam("usrloc", "hash_size", 14) 
>>                                             #2^14 - 16356 hash entries
>> modparam("usrloc", "location_cluster", 1)
>> modparam("usrloc", "cluster_mode","full-sharing")
>> modparam("usrloc", "working_mode_preset", "full-sharing-cluster")
>>
>>
>> Any ideas? Thanks,
>>
>> -- 
>> *Michael Ulitskiy*
>> Ace Innovative Networks, Inc.
>> https://www.aceinnovative.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at lists.opensips.org
>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20241105/e87700a9/attachment-0001.html>