[OpenSIPS-Users] choice of AS architecture

[Tito Cumpen]

Oleg,

I tried using the Seas module a while back and found out the support for it
was has dropped so I moved on to using restcomm sip servlets as an AS. I
recommend you look into it.

On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 6:30 AM Oleg Podguyko via Users <
users at lists.opensips.org> wrote:

> Hi Bogdan and all your team!
>
> We have been working with opensips for quite some time and we like it. We
> keep the load on the order of 300-400 CAPS, and for example, the SIP-I
> module is perhaps the only solution that allows you to fully work with
> ISUP. Our programmers prepared several PRs based on the results of work
> with SIP-I and SCTP modules.
> We are faced with the task of creating a classic bundle of cscf + AS
> server, in the future architecture opensips will play the role of cscf, and
> as AS we look at the module SEAS + external server.
>
> We are all moving towards IMS.
>
> What do you think, how justified can such a choice be? Perhaps the
> opensips team already has its own new vision for this?
> What would you choose as AS?
>
>
> --
> Oleg Podguyko
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20200415/bec77af1/attachment.html>