[OpenSIPS-Users] choice of AS architecture

[Bogdan-Andrei Iancu]

Hey Oleg,

What SIP features/capabilities do you want to have on the AS component? 
IMHO this is the point to start - based on your own requirements on what 
the AS must do, you can do a proper selection.

And yes, as Tito said, seas is dead fish in the water for a long time.

Regards,

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu

OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
   https://www.opensips-solutions.com

On 4/14/20 4:29 PM, Oleg Podguyko via Users wrote:
> Hi Bogdan and all your team!
> We have been working with opensips for quite some time and we like it. 
> We keep the load on the order of 300-400 CAPS, and for example, the 
> SIP-I module is perhaps the only solution that allows you to fully 
> work with ISUP. Our programmers prepared several PRs based on the 
> results of work with SIP-I and SCTP modules.
> We are faced with the task of creating a classic bundle of cscf + AS 
> server, in the future architecture opensips will play the role of 
> cscf, and as AS we look at the module SEAS + external server.
>
> We are all moving towards IMS.
> What do you think, how justified can such a choice be? Perhaps the 
> opensips team already has its own new vision for this?
> What would you choose as AS?
> --
> Oleg Podguyko
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20200416/16355417/attachment-0001.html>