[OpenSIPS-Users] opensipsctl fifo get_statistics - dialogs stats synced?
solarmon
solarmon at one-n.co.uk
Mon Oct 21 07:08:14 EDT 2019
Alexey,
Sorry, I'm a bit confused with your answer, and why you are using this
thread to ask another question!
I'm just trying to understand whether these statistics figures should be
synced or not, and why they would be different between the two clustered
openSIPS servers (clustered using corosync/pacemaker for the virtual IP,
and using 'clusterer' between the two OpenSIPS nodes).
On Mon, 21 Oct 2019 at 11:24, Alexey Kazantsev via Users <
users at lists.opensips.org> wrote:
> Hi, solarmon
>
> no, there’s no need to sync dialogs. It’s another type of cluster.
>
> As for now, the main purpose is just to have a common
> user location dataset, when OpenSIPS nodes will know
> the location of each registered device. If it’s connected locally,
> it will serve the call locally. If the device is registered on the other
> node,
> it will route the call there.
>
> Sure I know about clustering with dialogs syncing (we have such cluster),
> but this question is about another type of clustering.
>
> I emulated network connectivity ptoblems between two nodes
> (just dropped packets going to MongoDB instance) and after that
> I was unable to make any calls, no matter which device on which node is
> registered.
>
> So, I’d like to find the best solution which will sustain some short-time
> disconnections between nodes.
>
> I’m reading about MongoDB clustering but not sure if this is what I need.
>
>
>
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------
> BR, Alexey
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20191021/c16c66c2/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Users
mailing list