[OpenSIPS-Users] mediaproxy build fail: libiptc.c:63:8: error: redefinition of â

Thu Apr 21 14:00:56 CEST 2011


On 04/21/11 14:13, Saúl Ibarra Corretgé wrote:
> On 04/21/2011 01:06 PM, Dani Popa wrote:
>> sure,
>>
>> Apr 21 06:06:41 test media-relay[4903]:
>> mediaproxy.mediacontrol.StreamListenerProtocol starting on 50012
>> Apr 21 06:06:41 test media-relay[4903]:
>> mediaproxy.mediacontrol.StreamListenerProtocol starting on 50013
>> Apr 21 06:06:41 test media-relay[4903]:
>> mediaproxy.mediacontrol.StreamListenerProtocol starting on 50014
>> Apr 21 06:06:41 test media-relay[4903]:
>> mediaproxy.mediacontrol.StreamListenerProtocol starting on 50015
>> Apr 21 06:06:50 test media-relay[4903]: (Port 50012 Closed)
>> Apr 21 06:06:50 test media-relay[4903]: (Port 50013 Closed)
>> Apr 21 06:06:50 test media-relay[4903]: (Port 50014 Closed)
>> Apr 21 06:06:50 test media-relay[4903]: (Port 50015 Closed)
>>
>
> Don't you get teh statistics printed here?
>
I'm not talking abut binding ports for streams, i'm talking about stream 
packets and bytes info on telnet localhost 25060.

[{"from_tag": "4fc7812b", "start_time": 1303386789.09, "call_id": 
"f233072fb063d5c554bebffe80248eba at 0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0", "duration": 24, 
"streams": [{"status": "active", "caller_codec": "G711u", 
"post_dial_delay": 3.49981117249, "callee_codec": "G711u", 
"caller_bytes": 0, "start_time": 0, "callee_packets": 0, "callee_bytes": 
0, "caller_packets": 0, "callee_remote": "X.X.X.X:8752", "end_time": 24, 
"caller_remote": "X.X.X.X:5014", "media_type": "audio", "callee_local": 
"X.X.X.X:50006", "timeout_wait": 0, "caller_local": "X.X.X.X:50004"}], 
"to_tag": "a94c095b773be1dd6e8d668a785a9c848e314110", "to_uri": 
"123456789 at gigi.ro", "caller_ua": 
"Jitsi1.0-beta1-nightly.build.3408Linux", "callee_ua": "Cantata", 
"from_uri": "dani.popa at gigi.ro"}]


And also, when mediaproxy send radius acounting request, it send with : 
"caller_bytes": 0, "callee_packets": 0, "callee_bytes": 0, 
"caller_packets": 0

>> s
>> Also, i'm not very sure when(i'll make more tests and i'll come with
>> updates) and what conditions i get next kernel errors:
>>
>> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.838816] ctnetlink v0.93: registering
>> with nfnetlink.
>> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.838957] ------------[ cut here
>> ]------------
>> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.838971] WARNING: at
>> /build/buildd-linux-2.6_2.6.37-1-i386-vxjyZA/linux-2.6-2.6.37/debian/build/source_i38 
>>
>>
>> 6_none/mm/page_alloc.c:1990 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x17c/0x5ff()
>> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.838978] Hardware name: PowerEdge R310
>> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.838980] Modules linked in:
>> nf_conntrack_netlink xt_NOTRACK xt_tcpudp iptable_raw nfnetlink
>> iptable_nat nf_nat nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv4
>> ip_tables x_tables loop snd_pcm snd_timer snd soundcore snd_page_alloc
>> evdev button tpm_tis tpm processor pcspkr dcdbas ghes thermal_sys hed
>> tpm_bios power_meter ext3 jbd mbcache sd_mod crc_t10dif sg sr_mod cdrom
>> ata_generic ata_piix libata mptsas mptscsih mptbase ehci_hcd
>> scsi_transport_sas usbcore scsi_mod bnx2 nls_base [last unloaded:
>> scsi_wait_scan]
>> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839030] Pid: 2521, comm: media-relay
>> Not tainted 2.6.37-1-686-bigmem #1
>> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839033] Call Trace:
>> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839041] [<c1036005>] ?
>> warn_slowpath_common+0x6a/0x7b
>> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839047] [<c10986c8>] ?
>> __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x17c/0x5ff
>> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839052] [<c1036023>] ?
>> warn_slowpath_null+0xd/0x10
>> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839058] [<c10986c8>] ?
>> __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x17c/0x5ff
>> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839068] [<c102cd47>] ?
>> select_task_rq_fair+0x326/0x604
>> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839071] [<c1098b57>] ?
>> __get_free_pages+0xc/0x17
>> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839074] [<c10be2c7>] ?
>> __kmalloc_track_caller+0x32/0x127
>> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839077] [<f8d6c4da>] ?
>> nlmsg_new+0xf/0x11 [nf_conntrack_netlink]
>> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839080] [<c11fbb07>] ?
>> __alloc_skb+0x4c/0xda
>> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839082] [<f8d6c4da>] ?
>> nlmsg_new+0xf/0x11 [nf_conntrack_netlink]
>> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839085] [<f8d6e228>] ?
>> ctnetlink_conntrack_event+0x11e/0x3f2 [nf_conntrack_netlink]
>> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839087] [<f8d6c303>] ?
>> nf_conntrack_eventmask_report+0x98/0xfb [nf_conntrack_netlink]
>> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839090] [<f8d6c468>] ?
>> ctnetlink_del_conntrack+0xee/0x142 [nf_conntrack_netlink]
>> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839094] [<f8d36222>] ?
>> nfnetlink_rcv_msg+0x12b/0x15c [nfnetlink]
>> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839097] [<f8d360f7>] ?
>> nfnetlink_rcv_msg+0x0/0x15c [nfnetlink]
>> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839102] [<c121bd58>] ?
>> netlink_rcv_skb+0x2d/0x72
>> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839105] [<f8d360f1>] ?
>> nfnetlink_rcv+0x18/0x1e [nfnetlink]
>> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839107] [<c121bbac>] ?
>> netlink_unicast+0xba/0x10e
>> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839109] [<c121c6b0>] ?
>> netlink_sendmsg+0x23d/0x256
>> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839112] [<c11f5326>] ?
>> __sock_sendmsg+0x48/0x4e
>> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839114] [<c11f558f>] ?
>> sock_sendmsg+0x78/0x8f
>> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839117] [<c11c3cc4>] ?
>> extract_entropy+0x62/0x101
>> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839119] [<c10bc6d0>] ?
>> add_partial+0xe/0x40
>> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839122] [<c1093b34>] ?
>> find_get_page+0x19/0x5e
>> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839124] [<c10952e4>] ?
>> filemap_fault+0x196/0x33f
>> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839127] [<c1027195>] ?
>> __kunmap_atomic+0x61/0x79
>> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839129] [<c114fc19>] ?
>> _copy_from_user+0x2b/0x10e
>> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839131] [<c11f6015>] ?
>> sys_sendto+0xed/0x121
>> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839134] [<c10c3e13>] ?
>> alloc_file+0xf/0x89
>> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839138] [<c12a0793>] ?
>> do_page_fault+0x353/0x36f
>> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839140] [<c12a0780>] ?
>> do_page_fault+0x340/0x36f
>> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839142] [<c11f6f88>] ?
>> sys_socketcall+0x10a/0x1cb
>> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839145] [<c1008b1f>] ?
>> sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x28
>> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839147] ---[ end trace
>> 8883c080e30a8b9c ]---
>>
>
> This could be related to some API change in latest kernels. I'll look 
> into this.
>
>
> Regards,
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20110421/c0ce5a08/attachment-0001.htm>