<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<br>
<br>
On 04/21/11 14:13, Saúl Ibarra Corretgé wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:4DB01152.3030403@ag-projects.com" type="cite">On
04/21/2011 01:06 PM, Dani Popa wrote:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">sure,
<br>
<br>
Apr 21 06:06:41 test media-relay[4903]:
<br>
mediaproxy.mediacontrol.StreamListenerProtocol starting on 50012
<br>
Apr 21 06:06:41 test media-relay[4903]:
<br>
mediaproxy.mediacontrol.StreamListenerProtocol starting on 50013
<br>
Apr 21 06:06:41 test media-relay[4903]:
<br>
mediaproxy.mediacontrol.StreamListenerProtocol starting on 50014
<br>
Apr 21 06:06:41 test media-relay[4903]:
<br>
mediaproxy.mediacontrol.StreamListenerProtocol starting on 50015
<br>
Apr 21 06:06:50 test media-relay[4903]: (Port 50012 Closed)
<br>
Apr 21 06:06:50 test media-relay[4903]: (Port 50013 Closed)
<br>
Apr 21 06:06:50 test media-relay[4903]: (Port 50014 Closed)
<br>
Apr 21 06:06:50 test media-relay[4903]: (Port 50015 Closed)
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Don't you get teh statistics printed here?
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
I'm not talking abut binding ports for streams, i'm talking about
stream packets and bytes info on telnet localhost 25060. <br>
<br>
[{"from_tag": "4fc7812b", "start_time": 1303386789.09, "call_id":
"f233072fb063d5c554bebffe80248eba@0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0", <font
color="#3333ff">"duration": 24</font>, "streams": [{"status":
"active", "caller_codec": "G711u", "post_dial_delay": 3.49981117249,
"callee_codec": "G711u", "<font color="#cc0000">caller_bytes": 0</font>,
"start_time": 0, "<font color="#ff0000">callee_packets": 0,</font> "<font
color="#ff0000">callee_bytes": 0</font>, "<font color="#ff0000">caller_packets":
0</font>, "callee_remote": "X.X.X.X:8752", "end_time": 24,
"caller_remote": "X.X.X.X:5014", "media_type": "audio",
"callee_local": "X.X.X.X:50006", "timeout_wait": 0, "caller_local":
"X.X.X.X:50004"}], "to_tag":
"a94c095b773be1dd6e8d668a785a9c848e314110", "to_uri":
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:123456789@gigi.ro">"123456789@gigi.ro"</a>, "caller_ua":
"Jitsi1.0-beta1-nightly.build.3408Linux", "callee_ua": "Cantata",
"from_uri": <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:dani.popa@gigi.ro">"dani.popa@gigi.ro"</a>}]<br>
<br>
<br>
And also, when mediaproxy send radius acounting request, it send
with : "<font color="#cc0000">caller_bytes": 0</font>, "<font
color="#ff0000">callee_packets": 0,</font> "<font color="#ff0000">callee_bytes":
0</font>, "<font color="#ff0000">caller_packets": 0<br>
<br>
</font>
<blockquote cite="mid:4DB01152.3030403@ag-projects.com" type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">s
<br>
Also, i'm not very sure when(i'll make more tests and i'll come
with
<br>
updates) and what conditions i get next kernel errors:
<br>
<br>
Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.838816] ctnetlink v0.93:
registering
<br>
with nfnetlink.
<br>
Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.838957] ------------[ cut
here
<br>
]------------
<br>
Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.838971] WARNING: at
<br>
/build/buildd-linux-2.6_2.6.37-1-i386-vxjyZA/linux-2.6-2.6.37/debian/build/source_i38
<br>
<br>
6_none/mm/page_alloc.c:1990 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x17c/0x5ff()
<br>
Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.838978] Hardware name:
PowerEdge R310
<br>
Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.838980] Modules linked in:
<br>
nf_conntrack_netlink xt_NOTRACK xt_tcpudp iptable_raw nfnetlink
<br>
iptable_nat nf_nat nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv4
<br>
ip_tables x_tables loop snd_pcm snd_timer snd soundcore
snd_page_alloc
<br>
evdev button tpm_tis tpm processor pcspkr dcdbas ghes
thermal_sys hed
<br>
tpm_bios power_meter ext3 jbd mbcache sd_mod crc_t10dif sg
sr_mod cdrom
<br>
ata_generic ata_piix libata mptsas mptscsih mptbase ehci_hcd
<br>
scsi_transport_sas usbcore scsi_mod bnx2 nls_base [last
unloaded:
<br>
scsi_wait_scan]
<br>
Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839030] Pid: 2521, comm:
media-relay
<br>
Not tainted 2.6.37-1-686-bigmem #1
<br>
Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839033] Call Trace:
<br>
Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839041] [<c1036005>] ?
<br>
warn_slowpath_common+0x6a/0x7b
<br>
Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839047] [<c10986c8>] ?
<br>
__alloc_pages_nodemask+0x17c/0x5ff
<br>
Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839052] [<c1036023>] ?
<br>
warn_slowpath_null+0xd/0x10
<br>
Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839058] [<c10986c8>] ?
<br>
__alloc_pages_nodemask+0x17c/0x5ff
<br>
Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839068] [<c102cd47>] ?
<br>
select_task_rq_fair+0x326/0x604
<br>
Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839071] [<c1098b57>] ?
<br>
__get_free_pages+0xc/0x17
<br>
Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839074] [<c10be2c7>] ?
<br>
__kmalloc_track_caller+0x32/0x127
<br>
Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839077] [<f8d6c4da>] ?
<br>
nlmsg_new+0xf/0x11 [nf_conntrack_netlink]
<br>
Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839080] [<c11fbb07>] ?
<br>
__alloc_skb+0x4c/0xda
<br>
Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839082] [<f8d6c4da>] ?
<br>
nlmsg_new+0xf/0x11 [nf_conntrack_netlink]
<br>
Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839085] [<f8d6e228>] ?
<br>
ctnetlink_conntrack_event+0x11e/0x3f2 [nf_conntrack_netlink]
<br>
Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839087] [<f8d6c303>] ?
<br>
nf_conntrack_eventmask_report+0x98/0xfb [nf_conntrack_netlink]
<br>
Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839090] [<f8d6c468>] ?
<br>
ctnetlink_del_conntrack+0xee/0x142 [nf_conntrack_netlink]
<br>
Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839094] [<f8d36222>] ?
<br>
nfnetlink_rcv_msg+0x12b/0x15c [nfnetlink]
<br>
Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839097] [<f8d360f7>] ?
<br>
nfnetlink_rcv_msg+0x0/0x15c [nfnetlink]
<br>
Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839102] [<c121bd58>] ?
<br>
netlink_rcv_skb+0x2d/0x72
<br>
Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839105] [<f8d360f1>] ?
<br>
nfnetlink_rcv+0x18/0x1e [nfnetlink]
<br>
Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839107] [<c121bbac>] ?
<br>
netlink_unicast+0xba/0x10e
<br>
Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839109] [<c121c6b0>] ?
<br>
netlink_sendmsg+0x23d/0x256
<br>
Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839112] [<c11f5326>] ?
<br>
__sock_sendmsg+0x48/0x4e
<br>
Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839114] [<c11f558f>] ?
<br>
sock_sendmsg+0x78/0x8f
<br>
Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839117] [<c11c3cc4>] ?
<br>
extract_entropy+0x62/0x101
<br>
Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839119] [<c10bc6d0>] ?
<br>
add_partial+0xe/0x40
<br>
Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839122] [<c1093b34>] ?
<br>
find_get_page+0x19/0x5e
<br>
Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839124] [<c10952e4>] ?
<br>
filemap_fault+0x196/0x33f
<br>
Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839127] [<c1027195>] ?
<br>
__kunmap_atomic+0x61/0x79
<br>
Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839129] [<c114fc19>] ?
<br>
_copy_from_user+0x2b/0x10e
<br>
Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839131] [<c11f6015>] ?
<br>
sys_sendto+0xed/0x121
<br>
Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839134] [<c10c3e13>] ?
<br>
alloc_file+0xf/0x89
<br>
Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839138] [<c12a0793>] ?
<br>
do_page_fault+0x353/0x36f
<br>
Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839140] [<c12a0780>] ?
<br>
do_page_fault+0x340/0x36f
<br>
Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839142] [<c11f6f88>] ?
<br>
sys_socketcall+0x10a/0x1cb
<br>
Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839145] [<c1008b1f>] ?
<br>
sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x28
<br>
Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839147] ---[ end trace
<br>
8883c080e30a8b9c ]---
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
This could be related to some API change in latest kernels. I'll
look into this.
<br>
<br>
<br>
Regards,
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>