[OpenSIPS-Users] mediaproxy build fail: libiptc.c:63:8: error: redefinition of â

Thu Apr 21 13:13:22 CEST 2011

On 04/21/2011 01:06 PM, Dani Popa wrote:
> sure,
>
> Apr 21 06:06:41 test media-relay[4903]:
> mediaproxy.mediacontrol.StreamListenerProtocol starting on 50012
> Apr 21 06:06:41 test media-relay[4903]:
> mediaproxy.mediacontrol.StreamListenerProtocol starting on 50013
> Apr 21 06:06:41 test media-relay[4903]:
> mediaproxy.mediacontrol.StreamListenerProtocol starting on 50014
> Apr 21 06:06:41 test media-relay[4903]:
> mediaproxy.mediacontrol.StreamListenerProtocol starting on 50015
> Apr 21 06:06:50 test media-relay[4903]: (Port 50012 Closed)
> Apr 21 06:06:50 test media-relay[4903]: (Port 50013 Closed)
> Apr 21 06:06:50 test media-relay[4903]: (Port 50014 Closed)
> Apr 21 06:06:50 test media-relay[4903]: (Port 50015 Closed)
>

Don't you get teh statistics printed here?

> s
> Also, i'm not very sure when(i'll make more tests and i'll come with
> updates) and what conditions i get next kernel errors:
>
> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.838816] ctnetlink v0.93: registering
> with nfnetlink.
> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.838957] ------------[ cut here
> ]------------
> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.838971] WARNING: at
> /build/buildd-linux-2.6_2.6.37-1-i386-vxjyZA/linux-2.6-2.6.37/debian/build/source_i38
>
> 6_none/mm/page_alloc.c:1990 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x17c/0x5ff()
> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.838978] Hardware name: PowerEdge R310
> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.838980] Modules linked in:
> nf_conntrack_netlink xt_NOTRACK xt_tcpudp iptable_raw nfnetlink
> iptable_nat nf_nat nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv4
> ip_tables x_tables loop snd_pcm snd_timer snd soundcore snd_page_alloc
> evdev button tpm_tis tpm processor pcspkr dcdbas ghes thermal_sys hed
> tpm_bios power_meter ext3 jbd mbcache sd_mod crc_t10dif sg sr_mod cdrom
> ata_generic ata_piix libata mptsas mptscsih mptbase ehci_hcd
> scsi_transport_sas usbcore scsi_mod bnx2 nls_base [last unloaded:
> scsi_wait_scan]
> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839030] Pid: 2521, comm: media-relay
> Not tainted 2.6.37-1-686-bigmem #1
> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839033] Call Trace:
> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839041] [<c1036005>] ?
> warn_slowpath_common+0x6a/0x7b
> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839047] [<c10986c8>] ?
> __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x17c/0x5ff
> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839052] [<c1036023>] ?
> warn_slowpath_null+0xd/0x10
> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839058] [<c10986c8>] ?
> __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x17c/0x5ff
> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839068] [<c102cd47>] ?
> select_task_rq_fair+0x326/0x604
> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839071] [<c1098b57>] ?
> __get_free_pages+0xc/0x17
> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839074] [<c10be2c7>] ?
> __kmalloc_track_caller+0x32/0x127
> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839077] [<f8d6c4da>] ?
> nlmsg_new+0xf/0x11 [nf_conntrack_netlink]
> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839080] [<c11fbb07>] ?
> __alloc_skb+0x4c/0xda
> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839082] [<f8d6c4da>] ?
> nlmsg_new+0xf/0x11 [nf_conntrack_netlink]
> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839085] [<f8d6e228>] ?
> ctnetlink_conntrack_event+0x11e/0x3f2 [nf_conntrack_netlink]
> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839087] [<f8d6c303>] ?
> nf_conntrack_eventmask_report+0x98/0xfb [nf_conntrack_netlink]
> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839090] [<f8d6c468>] ?
> ctnetlink_del_conntrack+0xee/0x142 [nf_conntrack_netlink]
> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839094] [<f8d36222>] ?
> nfnetlink_rcv_msg+0x12b/0x15c [nfnetlink]
> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839097] [<f8d360f7>] ?
> nfnetlink_rcv_msg+0x0/0x15c [nfnetlink]
> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839102] [<c121bd58>] ?
> netlink_rcv_skb+0x2d/0x72
> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839105] [<f8d360f1>] ?
> nfnetlink_rcv+0x18/0x1e [nfnetlink]
> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839107] [<c121bbac>] ?
> netlink_unicast+0xba/0x10e
> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839109] [<c121c6b0>] ?
> netlink_sendmsg+0x23d/0x256
> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839112] [<c11f5326>] ?
> __sock_sendmsg+0x48/0x4e
> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839114] [<c11f558f>] ?
> sock_sendmsg+0x78/0x8f
> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839117] [<c11c3cc4>] ?
> extract_entropy+0x62/0x101
> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839119] [<c10bc6d0>] ?
> add_partial+0xe/0x40
> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839122] [<c1093b34>] ?
> find_get_page+0x19/0x5e
> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839124] [<c10952e4>] ?
> filemap_fault+0x196/0x33f
> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839127] [<c1027195>] ?
> __kunmap_atomic+0x61/0x79
> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839129] [<c114fc19>] ?
> _copy_from_user+0x2b/0x10e
> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839131] [<c11f6015>] ?
> sys_sendto+0xed/0x121
> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839134] [<c10c3e13>] ?
> alloc_file+0xf/0x89
> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839138] [<c12a0793>] ?
> do_page_fault+0x353/0x36f
> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839140] [<c12a0780>] ?
> do_page_fault+0x340/0x36f
> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839142] [<c11f6f88>] ?
> sys_socketcall+0x10a/0x1cb
> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839145] [<c1008b1f>] ?
> sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x28
> Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839147] ---[ end trace
> 8883c080e30a8b9c ]---
>

This could be related to some API change in latest kernels. I'll look 
into this.

Regards,

-- 
Saúl Ibarra Corretgé
AG Projects