[OpenSIPS-Users] feasablity / interest in a feature request.

[johan]

I use this for invite based dialogs.

trace("hep_id","d","sip");

I call it just before topology_hiding()

I don't see from/to header changes.

Can you check on your side Ben ?


wkr,

On 22/01/2021 15:28, Ben Newlin wrote:
>
> We are using siptrace and we get both the incoming and outbound
> message captured, with all changes. I think it depends on the scope
> you provide [1]. We use scope T for transactions and we get both.
>
>  
>
> Although, we are using OpenSIPS 2.4. It’s possible the functionality
> has changed in 3.x. In which case, I would agree that it is not good.
>
>  
>
> [1] - https://opensips.org/docs/modules/3.1.x/tracer.html#func_trace
>
>  
>
> Ben Newlin
>
>  
>
> *From: *Users <users-bounces at lists.opensips.org> on behalf of Andy
> Dierlam <adierlam at ptgi-ics.com>
> *Date: *Friday, January 22, 2021 at 9:13 AM
> *To: *OpenSIPS users mailling list <users at lists.opensips.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] feasablity / interest in a feature
> request.
>
> How about running a continuous tshark/pcap/ngrep on interfaces of
> interest.
>
> you can run every 10min.  putting in 10min files.
>
>  
>
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 6:36 AM johan <johan at democon.be
> <mailto:johan at democon.be>> wrote:
>
>     yeah me too.
>
>     but I want also to see the forwarded packet with all changes.
>
>     On 22/01/2021 12:13, Nick Altmann wrote:
>
>         It depends on purpose. For example, I need an initial
>         (untouched) packet there.
>
>
>         --
>
>         Nick
>
>          
>
>         пт, 22 янв. 2021 г. в 09:18, johan <johan at democon.be
>         <mailto:johan at democon.be>>:
>
>             Hi,
>
>
>             when you use the siptrace module and you go to homer from
>             opensips
>             (hence without a port mirror/span port on a switch), when
>             you change
>             from /to header, then the homer trace doesnot reflect the
>             real packet
>             that exits opensips (as we all know, from to header
>             changes are only
>             active when the packet is send out). 
>
>
>             I find this annoying as the purpose of having a tracer is
>             defeated by
>             this : we want to see the real packets with the changes
>             applied.
>
>
>             Therefore : are there more people on the list who are
>             ennoyed by this ?
>             If yes, then I will open a feature request for it.
>
>
>             wkr,
>
>             _______________________________________________
>             Users mailing list
>             Users at lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org>
>             http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>
>         Users mailing list
>
>         Users at lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org>
>
>         http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Users mailing list
>     Users at lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org>
>     http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20210122/3c007d3e/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0xD7D896F7DDA70EC3.asc
Type: application/pgp-keys
Size: 2456 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20210122/3c007d3e/attachment-0001.key>