[OpenSIPS-Users] Doubt on B2B Scenario

[Bogdan-Andrei Iancu]

Hi Daniel,

In 1.11, the TH support is still built-in the diaalog module:
http://www.opensips.org/html/docs/modules/1.11.x/dialog.html#id296413

Regards,

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com

On 21.10.2016 04:46, Daniel Zanutti wrote:
> This TH module is only for Opensips 2.x, i'm still using 1.11.x.
>
> If I setup a topology hiding schema on top of B2B, do you think I can 
> achieve same result? The only requirement is that I sometimes need to 
> call several gateways in a specific order and all calls must use the 
> TH feature. Is it possible?
>
> Thanks
>
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 6:46 PM, Daniel Zanutti 
> <daniel.zanutti at gmail.com <mailto:daniel.zanutti at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hi Bogdan
>
>     I'll take a look deeply.
>
>     Thanks
>
>
>     Em 20 de out de 2016 6:39 PM, "Bogdan-Andrei Iancu"
>     <bogdan at opensips.org <mailto:bogdan at opensips.org>> escreveu:
>
>         Hi Daniel,
>
>         Yes, TH is the only thing you can do about this. But as a
>         lighter approach to B2B, I suggest the TH support based on
>         dialog module:
>         http://www.opensips.org/html/docs/modules/2.2.x/topology_hiding.html
>         <http://www.opensips.org/html/docs/modules/2.2.x/topology_hiding.html>
>
>         Regards,
>
>         Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>         OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
>         http://www.opensips-solutions.com
>         <http://www.opensips-solutions.com>
>
>         On 20.10.2016 23:21, Daniel Zanutti wrote:
>>         Hi
>>         I'm having a problem with a specific client. It ignores
>>         Record-route and Via fields order and send a BYE to last
>>         destination, not the first one. This clearly breaks RFC and
>>         there's no way to solve this with his bug software.
>>         To solve this, I was planning to implement a B2B scenario to
>>         it, so I'll hide the topology and the "last destination" will
>>         be only me.
>>         What do you guys think about this? Is this a viable solution?
>>         Is there any other better solution? I don't wanna put an
>>         Asterisk to isolate it.
>>         Thanks
>>
>>         _______________________________________________
>>         Users mailing list
>>         Users at lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org>
>>         http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>         <http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20161021/e1bf171e/attachment.htm>