[OpenSIPS-Users] Doubt on B2B Scenario

[Daniel Zanutti]

This TH module is only for Opensips 2.x, i'm still using 1.11.x.

If I setup a topology hiding schema on top of B2B, do you think I can
achieve same result? The only requirement is that I sometimes need to call
several gateways in a specific order and all calls must use the TH feature.
Is it possible?

Thanks

On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 6:46 PM, Daniel Zanutti <daniel.zanutti at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Bogdan
>
> I'll take a look deeply.
>
> Thanks
>
> Em 20 de out de 2016 6:39 PM, "Bogdan-Andrei Iancu" <bogdan at opensips.org>
> escreveu:
>
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> Yes, TH is the only thing you can do about this. But as a lighter
>> approach to B2B, I suggest the TH support based on dialog module:
>>     http://www.opensips.org/html/docs/modules/2.2.x/topology_hiding.html
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>> OpenSIPS Founder and Developerhttp://www.opensips-solutions.com
>>
>> On 20.10.2016 23:21, Daniel Zanutti wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> I'm having a problem with a specific client. It ignores Record-route and
>> Via fields order and send a BYE to last destination, not the first one.
>> This clearly breaks RFC and there's no way to solve this with his bug
>> software.
>>
>> To solve this, I was planning to implement a B2B scenario to it, so I'll
>> hide the topology and the "last destination" will be only me.
>>
>> What do you guys think about this? Is this a viable solution? Is there
>> any other better solution? I don't wanna put an Asterisk to isolate it.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing listUsers at lists.opensips.orghttp://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20161020/0a7e88e1/attachment.htm>