[OpenSIPS-Users] Dispatcher user specific route question - 2.1
Satish Patel
satish.txt at gmail.com
Thu Mar 19 17:42:21 CET 2015
Thanks! for quick answer!!
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Vlad Paiu <vladpaiu at opensips.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It will do fail-over.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Vlad Paiu
> OpenSIPS Developerhttp://www.opensips-solutions.com
>
> On 19.03.2015 18:39, Satish Patel wrote:
>
> Thanks Vlad,
>
> Superb! so it will do round-robin? or fail-over?
>
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Vlad Paiu <vladpaiu at opensips.org> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> If you want to do dispatching between multiple setids, ds_select_dst()
>> allows that. See the docs at [1] , you can provide a comma separated list
>> of setids - so your $avp(zone) can contain '1,2' and OpenSIPS will try to
>> first send to the servers in setid 1, and then, if those fail, to the
>> servers in setid 2.
>>
>> [1] http://www.opensips.org/html/docs/modules/1.11.x/dispatcher#id294368
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> Vlad Paiu
>> OpenSIPS Developerhttp://www.opensips-solutions.com
>>
>> On 19.03.2015 06:17, Satish Patel wrote:
>>
>> I have add extra "zone" column in subscriber table,
>>
>> +--------------+---------+
>> | username | zone |
>> +--------------+---------+
>> | 1001 | 1 |
>> | 1002 | 2 |
>> +--------------+---------+
>>
>>
>> In dispatcher table I have following two Freeswitch in two groups.
>>
>> +-------+-----------------------------+--------------------+
>> | setid | destination | description |
>> +-------+------------------------------+-------------------+
>> | 1 | sip:fs1.example.com | Freeswitch-1 |
>> | 2 | sip:fs2.example.com | Freeswitch-2 |
>> +-------+------------------------------+-------------------+
>>
>>
>> in opensips.cfg script i am query subscriber table base on incoming
>> username and storing zone in avp(zone) variable, and calling same variable
>> in following code
>>
>> if ( !ds_select_dst("$avp(zone)", "4", "FM10"))
>>
>> Question: now either user belongs to zone 1 or 2, so it is *NOT* going
>> to do load-balancing between two. But if I want to allow some user to do
>> load-balancing then how it will be possible in above scenario?
>>
>> Can i set "setid" on fly so i can pass request along with user request
>> and set same group for both switch and user call load-balance on both
>> switch?
>>
>> Any other idea?
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing listUsers at lists.opensips.orghttp://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at lists.opensips.org
>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing listUsers at lists.opensips.orghttp://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20150319/35382e98/attachment.htm>
More information about the Users
mailing list