[OpenSIPS-Users] Concerns with 1.x series and new 2.1 Opensips
John Nash
john.nash778 at gmail.com
Mon Jan 12 11:39:28 CET 2015
Ok I will test flatstore and will see how it goes if I try to insert into
real DB using some other process (May be some script which will check for
new records in loop)
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 4:06 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan at opensips.org>
wrote:
> John,
>
> Using "exec" has its own penalties - the exec itself is CPU consuming as
> the Operating System has to create a new process each time. Os it is not
> I/O, but it is CPU (system time).
>
> For the accounting part, I still recommend the flatstore as the most
> efficient approach.
>
> Regards,
>
> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
> OpenSIPS Founder and Developerhttp://www.opensips-solutions.com
>
> On 12.01.2015 11:55, John Nash wrote:
>
> OK..I think doing accounting in exec makes perfect sense.
>
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan at opensips.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi John,
>>
>> Indeed, depending on the nature of the query, some answers can be cached,
>> other not. If not, you need to be sure your DB server is as efficient as
>> possible in answering.
>> Accounting via flatstore file can be realtime (data is written in RT into
>> file and you can rote them when you need).
>>
>> The next 2.1 is the first OpenSIPS version supporting Async I/O ops.
>> There are many kinds of I/O ops and used in many places. It is hard to add
>> async support for all of them from the day one. The current plan is to have
>> support for exec module, for rest_client module and possible for some mysql
>> queries.
>> In the worst case, you can push your DB queries into external scripts and
>> use the "exec" module with the async support.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>> OpenSIPS Founder and Developerhttp://www.opensips-solutions.com
>>
>> On 11.01.2015 15:48, John Nash wrote:
>>
>> Hello Bogdan,
>>
>> Thank you. Cache features are really good and I am using for Register
>> and Invite auth but I need to run a query to find out allowed duration for
>> a call (unfortunately caching cannot be used in that). Also Accounting I am
>> afraid has to be real time in my case.
>>
>> I think i should look forward to version 2.X till the features I need
>> are there. Any guess how long full featured development version will be out?
>>
>> John
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 1:16 AM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan at opensips.org
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Nash,
>>>
>>> It is somewhere in the middle :). Of course the DB ops will bring some
>>> penalties to the performance, so you need to take care and tune your DB for
>>> the best performance (not to drag down opensips). With db ops is very
>>> common in OpenSIPS scripts, so you do not do anything crazy or stupid there.
>>>
>>> Of course, you should look into optimizing the DB ops you use:
>>> - DB auth - use caching at script level (see
>>> http://www.opensips.org/Documentation/Tutorials-MemoryCaching)
>>> - ACC - consider using db_flatstore to avoid writing into a real DB
>>> - dialog - if not really a must use db modes 2 or 3 (
>>> http://www.opensips.org/html/docs/modules/1.11.x/dialog.html#id294001)
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>>> OpenSIPS Founder and Developerhttp://www.opensips-solutions.com
>>>
>>> On 09.01.2015 20:19, John Nash wrote:
>>>
>>> I have used opensips for load balancing and some border proxy+
>>> NAT+rtpproxy in past and am quite happy with it. Recently I decided to add
>>> DB operations (Auth and accounting, routing and dialog into it so that
>>> heavy lifting of VOIP network can be given to opensips. I wanted to send
>>> call to PBX only when it is really needed (Like voicemail and conference
>>> etc)
>>>
>>> But in a long time I saw this article
>>> http://www.opensips.org/Documentation/TroubleShooting-FindPerfPb
>>>
>>> As per this tutorial I think if any DB operation is slow, it will hit
>>> overall performance (I mean the transactions which do not require DB can
>>> also be stuck).
>>>
>>> I know good engineers at openisps have already figured it out and
>>> working on 2.X version but looks like it will take a while so that I can
>>> give it a try (As dialog is not in current release).
>>>
>>> With 1.X series + DB auth/acc + dialog should I reconsider my approach
>>> or there are systems running successfully and I am just being paranoid?
>>>
>>> John
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Users mailing listUsers at lists.opensips.orghttp://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20150112/d6c73d77/attachment.htm>
More information about the Users
mailing list