[OpenSIPS-Users] Concerns with 1.x series and new 2.1 Opensips

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu bogdan at opensips.org
Mon Jan 12 11:36:28 CET 2015


John,

Using "exec" has its own penalties - the exec itself is CPU consuming as 
the Operating System has to create a new process each time. Os it is not 
I/O, but it is CPU (system time).

For the accounting part, I still recommend the flatstore as the most 
efficient approach.

Regards,

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com

On 12.01.2015 11:55, John Nash wrote:
> OK..I think doing accounting in exec makes perfect sense.
>
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu 
> <bogdan at opensips.org <mailto:bogdan at opensips.org>> wrote:
>
>     Hi John,
>
>     Indeed, depending on the nature of the query, some answers can be
>     cached, other not. If not, you need to be sure your DB server is
>     as efficient as possible in answering.
>     Accounting via flatstore file can be realtime (data is written in
>     RT into file and you can rote them when you need).
>
>     The next 2.1 is the first OpenSIPS version supporting Async I/O
>     ops. There are many kinds of I/O ops and used in many places. It
>     is hard to add async support for all of them from the day one. The
>     current plan is to have support for exec module, for rest_client
>     module and possible for some mysql queries.
>     In the worst case, you can push your DB queries into external
>     scripts and use the "exec" module with the async support.
>
>     Best regards,
>
>     Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>     OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
>     http://www.opensips-solutions.com
>
>     On 11.01.2015 15:48, John Nash wrote:
>>     Hello Bogdan,
>>
>>     Thank you. Cache features are really good and I am using for
>>     Register and Invite auth  but I need to run a query to find out
>>     allowed duration for a call (unfortunately caching cannot be used
>>     in that). Also Accounting I am afraid has to be real time in my case.
>>
>>     I think i should look forward to version 2.X till the features I
>>     need are there. Any guess how long full featured development
>>     version will be out?
>>
>>     John
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 1:16 AM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>>     <bogdan at opensips.org <mailto:bogdan at opensips.org>> wrote:
>>
>>         Hi Nash,
>>
>>         It is somewhere in the middle :). Of course the DB ops will
>>         bring some penalties to the performance, so you need to take
>>         care and tune your DB for the best performance (not to drag
>>         down opensips). With db ops is very common in OpenSIPS
>>         scripts, so you do not do anything crazy or stupid there.
>>
>>         Of course, you should look into optimizing the DB ops you use:
>>             - DB auth - use caching at script level (see
>>         http://www.opensips.org/Documentation/Tutorials-MemoryCaching)
>>             - ACC - consider using db_flatstore to avoid writing into
>>         a real DB
>>             - dialog - if not really a must use db modes 2 or 3
>>         (http://www.opensips.org/html/docs/modules/1.11.x/dialog.html#id294001)
>>
>>         Regards,
>>
>>         Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>>         OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
>>         http://www.opensips-solutions.com
>>
>>         On 09.01.2015 20:19, John Nash wrote:
>>>         I have used opensips for load balancing and some border
>>>         proxy+ NAT+rtpproxy in past and am quite happy with it.
>>>         Recently I decided to add DB operations (Auth and
>>>         accounting, routing and dialog into it so that heavy lifting
>>>         of VOIP network can be given to opensips. I wanted to send
>>>         call to PBX only when it is really needed (Like voicemail
>>>         and conference etc)
>>>
>>>         But in a long time I saw this article
>>>         http://www.opensips.org/Documentation/TroubleShooting-FindPerfPb
>>>
>>>
>>>         As per this tutorial I think if any DB operation is slow, it
>>>         will hit overall performance (I mean the transactions which
>>>         do not require DB can also be stuck).
>>>
>>>         I know good engineers at openisps have already figured it
>>>         out and working on 2.X version but looks like it will take a
>>>         while so that I can give it a try (As dialog is not in
>>>         current release).
>>>
>>>         With 1.X series + DB auth/acc + dialog should I reconsider
>>>         my approach or there are systems running successfully and I
>>>         am just being paranoid?
>>>
>>>         John
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>         _______________________________________________
>>>         Users mailing list
>>>         Users at lists.opensips.org  <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org>
>>>         http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>>
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20150112/204511a3/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the Users mailing list