[OpenSIPS-Users] Concerns with 1.x series and new 2.1 Opensips
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
bogdan at opensips.org
Mon Jan 12 11:36:28 CET 2015
John,
Using "exec" has its own penalties - the exec itself is CPU consuming as
the Operating System has to create a new process each time. Os it is not
I/O, but it is CPU (system time).
For the accounting part, I still recommend the flatstore as the most
efficient approach.
Regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com
On 12.01.2015 11:55, John Nash wrote:
> OK..I think doing accounting in exec makes perfect sense.
>
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
> <bogdan at opensips.org <mailto:bogdan at opensips.org>> wrote:
>
> Hi John,
>
> Indeed, depending on the nature of the query, some answers can be
> cached, other not. If not, you need to be sure your DB server is
> as efficient as possible in answering.
> Accounting via flatstore file can be realtime (data is written in
> RT into file and you can rote them when you need).
>
> The next 2.1 is the first OpenSIPS version supporting Async I/O
> ops. There are many kinds of I/O ops and used in many places. It
> is hard to add async support for all of them from the day one. The
> current plan is to have support for exec module, for rest_client
> module and possible for some mysql queries.
> In the worst case, you can push your DB queries into external
> scripts and use the "exec" module with the async support.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
> OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
> http://www.opensips-solutions.com
>
> On 11.01.2015 15:48, John Nash wrote:
>> Hello Bogdan,
>>
>> Thank you. Cache features are really good and I am using for
>> Register and Invite auth but I need to run a query to find out
>> allowed duration for a call (unfortunately caching cannot be used
>> in that). Also Accounting I am afraid has to be real time in my case.
>>
>> I think i should look forward to version 2.X till the features I
>> need are there. Any guess how long full featured development
>> version will be out?
>>
>> John
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 1:16 AM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>> <bogdan at opensips.org <mailto:bogdan at opensips.org>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Nash,
>>
>> It is somewhere in the middle :). Of course the DB ops will
>> bring some penalties to the performance, so you need to take
>> care and tune your DB for the best performance (not to drag
>> down opensips). With db ops is very common in OpenSIPS
>> scripts, so you do not do anything crazy or stupid there.
>>
>> Of course, you should look into optimizing the DB ops you use:
>> - DB auth - use caching at script level (see
>> http://www.opensips.org/Documentation/Tutorials-MemoryCaching)
>> - ACC - consider using db_flatstore to avoid writing into
>> a real DB
>> - dialog - if not really a must use db modes 2 or 3
>> (http://www.opensips.org/html/docs/modules/1.11.x/dialog.html#id294001)
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>> OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
>> http://www.opensips-solutions.com
>>
>> On 09.01.2015 20:19, John Nash wrote:
>>> I have used opensips for load balancing and some border
>>> proxy+ NAT+rtpproxy in past and am quite happy with it.
>>> Recently I decided to add DB operations (Auth and
>>> accounting, routing and dialog into it so that heavy lifting
>>> of VOIP network can be given to opensips. I wanted to send
>>> call to PBX only when it is really needed (Like voicemail
>>> and conference etc)
>>>
>>> But in a long time I saw this article
>>> http://www.opensips.org/Documentation/TroubleShooting-FindPerfPb
>>>
>>>
>>> As per this tutorial I think if any DB operation is slow, it
>>> will hit overall performance (I mean the transactions which
>>> do not require DB can also be stuck).
>>>
>>> I know good engineers at openisps have already figured it
>>> out and working on 2.X version but looks like it will take a
>>> while so that I can give it a try (As dialog is not in
>>> current release).
>>>
>>> With 1.X series + DB auth/acc + dialog should I reconsider
>>> my approach or there are systems running successfully and I
>>> am just being paranoid?
>>>
>>> John
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Users mailing list
>>> Users at lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org>
>>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20150112/204511a3/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the Users
mailing list