[OpenSIPS-Users] Binary replication

Liviu Chircu liviu at opensips.org
Wed Feb 18 16:02:07 CET 2015


Hello Schneur,

1) If REGISTER request replication properly works (same messages 
received on both sides), then the backup should not delete contacts like 
you are mentioning.
2) Yes, it will. You can disable this behaviour with 
"skip_replicated_db_ops" [1]
3) Any specific ERRORs in the logfile? Please open a GitHub ticket for 
any obvious issues [2]
4) Only integrity checking. But that can be bypassed by a potential 
attacker. Immediate solutions are the use of private interfaces and/or 
iptables rules.
5) Yes, replication is only to be used with floating IPs. Regarding the 
distributed redundant setup, a big discussion was started in 2013, yet 
did not really come to a final conclusion [3]

[1]: 
http://www.opensips.org/html/docs/modules/2.1.x/usrloc.html#skip_replicated_db_ops
[2]: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/issues
[3]: http://opensips.org/pipermail/users/2013-April/025204.html

Best regards,

Liviu Chircu
OpenSIPS Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com

On 18.02.2015 12:19, Schneur Rosenberg wrote:
> I have a question regarding binary replication, I was using OpenSIPS 
> 1.7 until now, my backup was passive, because when they were all up at 
> the same time, the usrloc timer from the backup kept on removing users 
> from the database, even though I'm using mode 2, I still rely on the 
> DB for some actions, I recently watched Vlad Paiu video presentation 
> on Binary Interface replication and he says that he advises to leave 
> the backup open too, so I built 2 test servers with OpenSIPS 1.11 and 
> I have a few questions.
>
> 1) will this solve the issue of the usrloc timer deleting records?
> 2) will it also update the backups database if I use mode 2? this way 
> I dont need to replicate the db's, i will have 2 separate db's and 
> have each server update its own db, if it does this will also solve 
> problem 1.
> 3) I tested the bin replication, when doing a ngrep I see the packet 
> coming in on the backup when a new user registers, but when doing a 
> "opensipsctl ul show"  it only shows the contact line and nothing else 
> and it disappears completely after a few moments and it does not 
> update the db.
> 4) Does it have a built in security mechanism besides manually doing 
> it with iptables?
> 5) It seems like this is mainly used with a floating ip, I have 
> servers on the same network using floating ip, I also have servers on 
> different networks using failover dns, how will it affect my 
> redundancy, I assume the backup server wont be able to reach the 
> client before the client does a new DNS lookup and re registers, 
> because the clients NAT wont allow it through, is that correct? and is 
> there a solution for that?
>
> thanks in advance
> S. Rosenberg
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20150218/1cc06453/attachment.htm>


More information about the Users mailing list