[OpenSIPS-Users] sip_msg_validate()

[Bogdan-Andrei Iancu]

In this case, it means the function has to report something more than 
-1....like: -1 no MF hdr, -2 missing body, -3 missing TO, etc...

Regards,

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com


On 02/26/2013 03:32 PM, Nick Altmann wrote:
> Bogdan,
>
> I'm second time deal with problem when I receive "-1" from script and 
> to understand what is not okay I should compare message with source 
> code. :-)
> Of course I receive and interpret this codes, but "-1" is not fully 
> informative sometimes. Especially when sdp length is not okay. :-)
>
> --
> Nick
>
>
> 2013/2/26 Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan at opensips.org 
> <mailto:bogdan at opensips.org>>
>
>     Hi Nick,
>
>     Such a change may induce a self-spaming effect on your logs :). I
>     would rather interpret the return code from script and let the
>     script writer the decision if he wants to log that or
>     not...(depending on the failed check, maybe if local subscriber or
>     not, etc).
>
>     At least these are my 2 cents on the matter :)
>
>     Regards,
>
>     Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>     OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
>     http://www.opensips-solutions.com
>
>
>     On 02/26/2013 01:01 PM, Nick Altmann wrote:
>>     Hello!
>>
>>     What about to change DBG messages in sip_msg_validate() to ERR or
>>     INFO? It will help to understand the reason of reject. Especially
>>     for -1 return (the message is not RFC3261 compliant).
>>
>>     --
>>     Nick
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Users mailing list
>>     Users at lists.opensips.org  <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org>
>>     http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20130226/4d3027b1/attachment-0001.htm>