[OpenSIPS-Users] Invalid contacts in location table, TCP timeout

[Bogdan-Andrei Iancu]

Hi Fabian,

yes, use only one option a) or b) ( from (1) ). and indeed, a) gives you 
more liberty as you select the last 2 or so (not only the last one as 
you have in b) ). But on second thoughts, use the desc_timer_order in 
both cases (a and b) !

Regards,

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com


On 10/25/2012 06:55 PM, Fabian Bernhard wrote:
> Hi Bogdan,
>
> Thank you very much for your answer. We have tested the 
> tcp_connect_timeout and have already very good results.
>
> I have some follow up questions, if I may:
>
>     1) limiting the number of contacts to be used:
>         a) either keep in memory just one registration (last one) -
>     see the "cxx" and "f" flags
>     http://www.opensips.org/html/docs/modules/1.8.x/registrar.html#id292725
>            doing save("location","c1f")
>         b) either keep all contacts in mem, but use only the most
>     recent one:
>     modparam("usrloc", "desc_time_order", 1)
>            lookup("location","b"); # see
>     http://www.opensips.org/html/docs/modules/1.8.x/registrar.html#id292943
>
>
> Do I understand this correctly, if I use option b) then option a) is 
> useless, i.e. I should only use one of the two options?
>
> It is not relevant for testing, but if we would like to support 
> multiple registrations with the same SIP id from different locations, 
> for instance home and office, should we then use option a) with 
> something like save("location", "c2f")?
>
> Regards,
>
> Fabian
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20121025/48a47933/attachment.htm>