[OpenSIPS-Users] Issue with multiple Route header

[Gomtesh Jain]

Hi Bogdan,
    I put 2 log messages before and after record_route to make sure it gets
executed.
But I dont's see those messages in log  1st scenario (2 route headers)
while I can see both the message in log in 2nd scenario (1 route header).

Here I give INVITE messages in 1st scenario...


INVITE sip:aa1 at management.3clogic.com:5506 SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 192.168.3.134:1323
;rport;branch=z9hG4bKPj564512b7c47d4f1c91bf69b2616eea18
Max-Forwards: 70
From: sip:aa1 at management.3clogic.com:5506
;tag=9fa0b4f78ee640dba4c6e0522c9c63a8
To: sip:aa1 at management.3clogic.com:5506
Contact: <sip:aa1 at 192.168.3.134:1321;transport=TCP;ob>
Call-ID: 8ba1014b656e4cdc968bcf4a9c92ae66
CSeq: 3514 INVITE
*Route: <sip:23.20.79.160:7060;transport=TCP;lr>
Route: <sip:208.109.191.105:8060;lr>*
Allow: PRACK, INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, UPDATE, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, REFER,
MESSAGE, OPTIONS
Supported: replaces, 100rel, timer, norefersub
Session-Expires: 300
Min-SE: 90
User-Agent: WebAstra
X-Info: normal;;P=;L=;S=Out;A=aa1;CI=;CS=1;PI=1;CP=1
Content-Type: application/sdp
Content-Length:   259

TCP Proxy fwds ...

INVITE sip:aa1 at management.3clogic.com:5506 SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 23.20.79.160:7060;branch=z9hG4bK9618.b76ba1d3.0;i=fe
Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 192.168.3.134:1323
;received=115.252.66.182;rport=1323;branch=z9hG4bKPj564512b7c47d4f1c91bf69b2616eea18
Max-Forwards: 69
From: sip:aa1 at management.3clogic.com:5506
;tag=9fa0b4f78ee640dba4c6e0522c9c63a8
To: sip:aa1 at management.3clogic.com:5506
Contact: <sip:aa1 at 115.252.66.182:1323;transport=TCP;ob>
Call-ID: 8ba1014b656e4cdc968bcf4a9c92ae66
CSeq: 3514 INVITE
Route: <sip:208.109.191.105:8060;lr>
Allow: PRACK, INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, UPDATE, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, REFER,
MESSAGE, OPTIONS
Supported: replaces, 100rel, timer, norefersub
Session-Expires: 300
Min-SE: 90
User-Agent: WebAstra
X-Info: normal;;P=;L=;S=Out;A=aa1;CI=;CS=1;PI=1;CP=1
Content-Type: application/sdp
Content-Length:   25


Thanx,
Gomtesh


On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan at opensips.org>wrote:

> **
> You say you do record_route(), but no RR header is added to the request ?
> this is a bit hard to believe ....are you sure your script ends to the RR
> function ?
>
> Regards,
>
> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
> OpenSIPS Founder and Developerhttp://www.opensips-solutions.com
>
>
> On 08/16/2012 01:23 PM, Gomtesh Jain wrote:
>
> Hi Bogdan,
>    I am doing ...
>
>  if (!method=="REGISTER")
>         {
>             xlog("L_NOTICE", "Before Add Record Route TCP OPENSIPS \n");
>             record_route();
>             xlog("L_NOTICE", "Add Record Route TCP OPENSIPS \n");
>          }
>
> in my config .
>
>
> But in 1st scenario it does not add record route .So UA1 tries to send ACK
> directly to "Other proxy". Which is wrong.
>
>
>  While it adds record route in 2nd scenario and all signalling works fine.
>
>
> Thanx,
> Gomtesh
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan at opensips.org>wrote:
>
>> Hi Gomtesh,
>>
>>
>> On 08/14/2012 04:10 PM, Gomtesh Jain wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>   I am running opensips 1.6 as TCP proxy. I am facing problem when I use
>>> multiple proxy in my N/w.
>>>
>>>   UA1------> TCP proxy(opensips 1.6)------->Other Proxy--------> UA2
>>>
>>> UA1 adds 2 Route headers in INVITE.
>>> In this scenario TCP proxy does not add Record Route in INVITE.
>>>
>>  How comes ?? don;t you do record_route() on the opensips ??
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> UA1------> TCP proxy(opensips 1.6)------------> UA2
>>>
>>> UA1 add only 1 Route header.
>>> In this scenario It works fine with the same conf.
>>>
>>  What "fine" means ? It means opensips adds on route  ? or ?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Bogdan
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20120816/6ae51974/attachment.htm>