[OpenSIPS-Users] Issue with multiple Route header

[Bogdan-Andrei Iancu]

You say you do record_route(), but no RR header is added to the request 
? this is a bit hard to believe ....are you sure your script ends to the 
RR function ?

Regards,

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com


On 08/16/2012 01:23 PM, Gomtesh Jain wrote:
> Hi Bogdan,
>    I am doing ...
>
>  if (!method=="REGISTER")
>         {
>             xlog("L_NOTICE", "Before Add Record Route TCP OPENSIPS \n");
>             record_route();
>             xlog("L_NOTICE", "Add Record Route TCP OPENSIPS \n");
>          }
>
> in my config .
>
>
> But in 1st scenario it does not add record route .So UA1 tries to send 
> ACK directly to "Other proxy". Which is wrong.
>
>
>  While it adds record route in 2nd scenario and all signalling works fine.
>
>
> Thanx,
> Gomtesh
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu 
> <bogdan at opensips.org <mailto:bogdan at opensips.org>> wrote:
>
>     Hi Gomtesh,
>
>
>     On 08/14/2012 04:10 PM, Gomtesh Jain wrote:
>
>         Hi,
>
>           I am running opensips 1.6 as TCP proxy. I am facing problem
>         when I use multiple proxy in my N/w.
>
>           UA1------> TCP proxy(opensips 1.6)------->Other
>         Proxy--------> UA2
>
>         UA1 adds 2 Route headers in INVITE.
>         In this scenario TCP proxy does not add Record Route in INVITE.
>
>     How comes ?? don;t you do record_route() on the opensips ??
>
>
>
>
>
>         UA1------> TCP proxy(opensips 1.6)------------> UA2
>
>         UA1 add only 1 Route header.
>         In this scenario It works fine with the same conf.
>
>     What "fine" means ? It means opensips adds on route  ? or ?
>
>     Regards,
>     Bogdan
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20120816/076afffb/attachment-0001.htm>