[OpenSIPS-Users] How two OpenSIPS Active - Active Load balancing
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
bogdan at opensips.org
Thu Sep 15 20:08:16 CEST 2011
Could be - I guess you need to configure in FS what is the SIP domain it
needs to handle as local....
Bogdan
On 09/15/2011 09:06 PM, vip killa wrote:
> Could it be because of the domain? my UAs are registered to
> pbx01.demo.voip.net <http://pbx01.demo.voip.net> (which points to ip
> of opensips)
> so when the UA1 calls UA2:
> UA1 -> pbx01.demo.voip.net <http://pbx01.demo.voip.net> (OS) -> FS ->
> UA2 at pbx01.demo.voip.net <mailto:UA2 at pbx01.demo.voip.net> -> OS ?
>
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
> <bogdan at opensips.org <mailto:bogdan at opensips.org>> wrote:
>
> checking the FS and OS integration, I see opensips is configured
> to act only as inbound entity (between end user and FS, in this
> direction only). So I agree that the flow should be UA1 -> OS ->
> FS -> UA2 in this case....But the trace for the faulty call
> (between 2 extensions) was showing UA1 -> OS -> FS -> OS......
>
> So, the question is why FS sends call back to OS instead of
> sending it to the target extension.
>
> Regards,
> Bogdan
>
>
> On 09/15/2011 08:40 PM, vip killa wrote:
>> I'm not 100% certain because im only following the tutorial but i
>> think it would be UA1 -> OS -> FS -> UA2
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>> <bogdan at opensips.org <mailto:bogdan at opensips.org>> wrote:
>>
>> We can continue here the discussion from #opensips IRC channel.
>>
>> So, for the call between extensions, what is the supposed
>> (correct) call flow ?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Bogdan
>>
>>
>> On 09/14/2011 10:12 PM, vip killa wrote:
>>> I followed this guide:
>>> http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Enterprise_deployment_OpenSIPS#OpenSIPS
>>>
>>> Inbound calls work but I can't call one extensions to another
>>> EG: 1000 can't call 1001 or vice versa
>>> #freeswitch folks said something was most likely wrong with
>>> the opensips.cfg
>>> here is sip trace:
>>> http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/17334
>>>
>>> .17 = opensips
>>> .18 = FS
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>>> <bogdan at opensips.org <mailto:bogdan at opensips.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>> you mean how to do LB ? if so , see
>>> http://www.opensips.org/Resources/DocsTutorials#toc4
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Bogdan
>>>
>>>
>>> On 09/14/2011 09:35 PM, vip killa wrote:
>>>> Would you mind posting your opensips.cfg ? I'm
>>>> attempting to do same setup but I'm new to opensips and
>>>> I don't understand how to do this.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Robert Thomas
>>>> <thomcr at gmail.com <mailto:thomcr at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hello List,
>>>>
>>>> I currently have this setup.
>>>>
>>>> Opensips -> Asterisk farm
>>>>
>>>> Opensips is using the dialog module and Load
>>>> balancer module. Right now the Opensips keeps track
>>>> of the amount of active dialogs and balance calls
>>>> between my server farm.
>>>>
>>>> I would like to have two opensips doing balancing
>>>> for a few reason. My concern is if I give 2 IPs to
>>>> my customers, each server will know how many active
>>>> channel has againts the GW but is not a realistic
>>>> number. Each Opensips keeps its own count.
>>>>
>>>> I remember the t_replicate function from a
>>>> bootcamp, so I was wondering if this could be a
>>>> situation to use it and how.
>>>>
>>>> Has anyone tried this setup and what would be the
>>>> best approach for scalability.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Robert
>>>>
--
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS eBootcamp - 19th of September 2011
OpenSIPS solutions and "know-how"
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20110915/4c7ddabf/attachment.htm>
More information about the Users
mailing list