[OpenSIPS-Users] How two OpenSIPS Active - Active Load balancing

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu bogdan at opensips.org
Thu Sep 15 20:08:16 CEST 2011


Could be - I guess you need to configure in FS what is the SIP domain it 
needs to handle as local....

Bogdan

On 09/15/2011 09:06 PM, vip killa wrote:
> Could it be because of the domain? my UAs are registered to 
> pbx01.demo.voip.net <http://pbx01.demo.voip.net> (which points to ip 
> of opensips)
> so when the UA1 calls UA2:
> UA1 -> pbx01.demo.voip.net <http://pbx01.demo.voip.net> (OS) -> FS -> 
> UA2 at pbx01.demo.voip.net <mailto:UA2 at pbx01.demo.voip.net> -> OS ?
>
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu 
> <bogdan at opensips.org <mailto:bogdan at opensips.org>> wrote:
>
>     checking the FS and OS integration, I see opensips is configured
>     to act only as inbound entity (between end user and FS, in this
>     direction only). So I agree that the flow should be UA1 -> OS ->
>     FS -> UA2 in this case....But the trace for the faulty call
>     (between 2 extensions) was showing UA1 -> OS -> FS -> OS......
>
>     So, the question is why FS sends call back to OS instead of
>     sending it to the target extension.
>
>     Regards,
>     Bogdan
>
>
>     On 09/15/2011 08:40 PM, vip killa wrote:
>>     I'm not 100% certain because im only following the tutorial but i
>>     think it would be UA1 -> OS -> FS -> UA2
>>
>>
>>     On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>>     <bogdan at opensips.org <mailto:bogdan at opensips.org>> wrote:
>>
>>         We can continue here the discussion from #opensips IRC channel.
>>
>>         So, for the call between extensions, what is the supposed
>>         (correct) call flow ?
>>
>>         Regards,
>>         Bogdan
>>
>>
>>         On 09/14/2011 10:12 PM, vip killa wrote:
>>>         I followed this guide:
>>>         http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Enterprise_deployment_OpenSIPS#OpenSIPS
>>>
>>>         Inbound calls work but I can't call one extensions to another
>>>         EG: 1000 can't call 1001 or vice versa
>>>         #freeswitch folks said something was most likely wrong with
>>>         the opensips.cfg
>>>         here is sip trace:
>>>         http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/17334
>>>
>>>         .17 = opensips
>>>         .18 = FS
>>>
>>>         On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>>>         <bogdan at opensips.org <mailto:bogdan at opensips.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>>             you mean how to do LB ? if so , see
>>>             http://www.opensips.org/Resources/DocsTutorials#toc4
>>>
>>>             Regards,
>>>             Bogdan
>>>
>>>
>>>             On 09/14/2011 09:35 PM, vip killa wrote:
>>>>             Would you mind posting your opensips.cfg ? I'm
>>>>             attempting to do same setup but I'm new to opensips and
>>>>             I don't understand how to do this.
>>>>
>>>>             On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Robert Thomas
>>>>             <thomcr at gmail.com <mailto:thomcr at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>                 Hello List,
>>>>
>>>>                 I currently have this setup.
>>>>
>>>>                 Opensips -> Asterisk farm
>>>>
>>>>                 Opensips is using the dialog module and Load
>>>>                 balancer module. Right now the Opensips keeps track
>>>>                 of the amount of active dialogs and balance calls
>>>>                 between my server farm.
>>>>
>>>>                 I would like to have two opensips doing balancing
>>>>                 for a few reason. My concern is if I give 2 IPs to
>>>>                 my customers, each server will know how many active
>>>>                 channel has againts the GW but is not a realistic
>>>>                 number. Each Opensips keeps its own count.
>>>>
>>>>                 I remember the t_replicate function from a
>>>>                 bootcamp, so I was wondering if this could be a
>>>>                 situation to use it and how.
>>>>
>>>>                 Has anyone tried this setup and what would be the
>>>>                 best approach for scalability.
>>>>
>>>>                 -- 
>>>>                 Robert
>>>>

-- 
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS eBootcamp - 19th of September 2011
OpenSIPS solutions and "know-how"

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20110915/4c7ddabf/attachment.htm>


More information about the Users mailing list