[OpenSIPS-Users] How two OpenSIPS Active - Active Load balancing

[Bogdan-Andrei Iancu]

checking the FS and OS integration, I see opensips is configured to act 
only as inbound entity (between end user and FS, in this direction 
only). So I agree that the flow should be UA1 -> OS -> FS -> UA2 in this 
case....But the trace for the faulty call (between 2 extensions) was 
showing UA1 -> OS -> FS -> OS......

So, the question is why FS sends call back to OS instead of sending it 
to the target extension.

Regards,
Bogdan

On 09/15/2011 08:40 PM, vip killa wrote:
> I'm not 100% certain because im only following the tutorial but i 
> think it would be UA1 -> OS -> FS -> UA2
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu 
> <bogdan at opensips.org <mailto:bogdan at opensips.org>> wrote:
>
>     We can continue here the discussion from #opensips IRC channel.
>
>     So, for the call between extensions, what is the supposed
>     (correct) call flow ?
>
>     Regards,
>     Bogdan
>
>
>     On 09/14/2011 10:12 PM, vip killa wrote:
>>     I followed this guide:
>>     http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Enterprise_deployment_OpenSIPS#OpenSIPS
>>
>>     Inbound calls work but I can't call one extensions to another
>>     EG: 1000 can't call 1001 or vice versa
>>     #freeswitch folks said something was most likely wrong with the
>>     opensips.cfg
>>     here is sip trace:
>>     http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/17334
>>
>>     .17 = opensips
>>     .18 = FS
>>
>>     On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>>     <bogdan at opensips.org <mailto:bogdan at opensips.org>> wrote:
>>
>>         you mean how to do LB ? if so , see
>>         http://www.opensips.org/Resources/DocsTutorials#toc4
>>
>>         Regards,
>>         Bogdan
>>
>>
>>         On 09/14/2011 09:35 PM, vip killa wrote:
>>>         Would you mind posting your opensips.cfg ? I'm attempting to
>>>         do same setup but I'm new to opensips and I don't understand
>>>         how to do this.
>>>
>>>         On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Robert Thomas
>>>         <thomcr at gmail.com <mailto:thomcr at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>             Hello List,
>>>
>>>             I currently have this setup.
>>>
>>>             Opensips -> Asterisk farm
>>>
>>>             Opensips is using the dialog module and Load balancer
>>>             module. Right now the Opensips keeps track of the amount
>>>             of active dialogs and balance calls between my server farm.
>>>
>>>             I would like to have two opensips doing balancing for a
>>>             few reason. My concern is if I give 2 IPs to my
>>>             customers, each server will know how many active channel
>>>             has againts the GW but is not a realistic number. Each
>>>             Opensips keeps its own count.
>>>
>>>             I remember the t_replicate function from a bootcamp, so
>>>             I was wondering if this could be a situation to use it
>>>             and how.
>>>
>>>             Has anyone tried this setup and what would be the best
>>>             approach for scalability.
>>>
>>>             -- 
>>>             Robert
>>>
>>>             _______________________________________________
>>>             Users mailing list
>>>             Users at lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org>
>>>             http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>         _______________________________________________
>>>         Users mailing list
>>>         Users at lists.opensips.org  <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org>
>>>         http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>>
>>         -- 
>>         Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>>         OpenSIPS eBootcamp - 19th of September 2011
>>         OpenSIPS solutions and "know-how"
>>
>>
>
>
>     -- 
>     Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>     OpenSIPS eBootcamp - 19th of September 2011
>     OpenSIPS solutions and "know-how"
>
>


-- 
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS eBootcamp - 19th of September 2011
OpenSIPS solutions and "know-how"

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20110915/33451909/attachment-0001.htm>