[OpenSIPS-Users] any reason why Opensips would replace 503 with 500 ?

[thrillerbee]

Bogdan,

Is this or could this be configurable?  It, unfortunately, breaks a lot of
existing applications.

Thanks.

On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
<bogdan at voice-system.ro>wrote:

> Hi Julien,
>
> see:
> http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/2010-September/014505.html
>
> Regards,
> Bogdan
>
> Julien Chavanton wrote:
> > Hi, is there any reason why Opensips would replace 503 with 500 ?
> >
> > The UA initiating the call expect 503 to reroute somewhere else
> >
> > INVITE :
> >
> >  10.0.20.14(UA) -> 10.2.0.1(Proxy) -> 10.0.4.202(UA)
> >
> > RESPONSE :
> >
> > U 10.0.4.202:5060 -> 10.2.0.1:5060
> > SIP/2.0 503 Service Unavailable.
> >
> > U 10.2.0.1:5060 -> 10.0.20.14:53584
> > SIP/2.0 500 Service Unavailable.
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Users mailing list
> > Users at lists.opensips.org
> > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
> >
>
>
> --
> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
> OpenSIPS Bootcamp
> 15 - 19 November 2010, Edison, New Jersey, USA
> www.voice-system.ro
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20101007/a0bee37b/attachment.htm