[OpenSIPS-Users] b2bua top hiding + authentication

[Bogdan-Andrei Iancu]

Jeff Pyle wrote:
> Following up... I did have a bad IP address in the server_address module
> parameter.  Fixing it did not help the situation.
>
> With the top-hiding scenario called before auth, I notice a bunch of error
> messages in the log at debug=3 including:
>
> ERROR:tm:_reply_light: failed to generate 407 reply when a final 407 was
> sent out
> ERROR:b2b_entities:b2b_send_reply: failed to send reply with tm
> ERROR:b2b_entities:b2b_prescript_f: No dialog found
>
> My script runs create_dialog() after authentication, so the b2b scenario
> starting before auth, it also starts before there is a dialog.
>
>   
Lost me here - create_dialog() has nothing to do with b2bua stuff...

So please try the scenario with auth and if succesfull, do b2bua.   If 
something does not work, traces and logs will be usefull.

Regards,
Bogdan




> I don't know where to go from here.
>
>
> - Jeff
>
>
>
>
> On 9/15/09 3:51 PM, "Jeff Pyle" <jpyle at fidelityvoice.com> wrote:
>
>   
>> Hi Bogdan,
>>
>> I tried it first after the auth for initial INVITEs.  It seems to re-auth
>> (another 407 is sent to the UAC), but then forwards the INVITE upstream to
>> the UAS.  In this case the call UAS sends 100, 180, then 200.  Opensips
>> appears to forward only the 200 and not the 180.  The UAC ignores the 200
>> because as far as it knows the transaction ended in a 407 (which the UAC
>> ACK'd).
>>
>> Next, I put it before the auth for initial INVITEs only.  It appears to be
>> the same story as when it is in place before the auth.
>>
>>
>> - Jeff
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 9/15/09 11:06 AM, "Jeff Pyle" <jpyle at fidelityvoice.com> wrote:
>>
>>     
>>> Hi Bogdan,
>>>
>>> I had tried both.  I'm compiling the latest 1.6; when that completes I'll
>>> try again.  Which way is recommended?
>>>
>>> I have a functioning configuration otherwise.  If I simply want topology
>>> hiding between the UAC and UAS, it is as simple as invoking the b2bua at
>>> some point and the rest will simply work as it did previously?  or am I
>>> missing something?
>>>
>>>
>>> - Jeff
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 9/15/09 11:03 AM, "Bogdan-Andrei Iancu" <bogdan at voice-system.ro> wrote:
>>>
>>>       
>>>> Hi Jeff,
>>>>
>>>> How are the auth and b2bua chained ? you first do auth and after that
>>>> invoke the b2bua ? or?
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Bogdan
>>>>
>>>> Jeff Pyle wrote:
>>>>         
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> What impact does authentication have on the b2bua modules?  When I put
>>>>> b2b_init_request("top hiding") into my otherwise functioning script, very
>>>>> strange things happen.
>>>>>
>>>>> In order to achieve topology hiding, is it as simple as inserting this init
>>>>> line at some point, or is there more to it?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> - Jeff
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>