[OpenSIPS-Users] No solution with asterisk possible? New feature in TM? Re: parallel forking and CANCEL/BYE

[Iñaki Baz Castillo]

El Viernes, 23 de Octubre de 2009, Uwe Kastens escribió:
> Hi,
> 
> > Yes, I've replied to that mail right now. It seems to be a bug in
> > mediaproxy.
> >
> > PS: IMHO you should try to avoid those two 200 OK (INVITE) at the same
> > time (even if it's correct).
> > Perhaps you could add a "Wait(1)" in top of the dialplan of the second
> > Asterisk server so if there won't be a race between CANCEL and 200
> > (INVITE).
> 
> The UAC are not under my control.

Yes, but you could instruct that UAC to send traffic to a new B2BUA server in 
your network, right? :)


> > Or even better: why you send the INVITE to both Asterisk at the same time
> > (parallel forking)? Is not enough for you to do load balancing and serial
> > forking in case of failure)? (of course it could be non suitable in your
> > case).
> 
> No, since the subscriber with the asterisk UAC is using the INVITE as LB
> and Failover Solution. Since this is nothing against RFC I would like to
>  implement it.

What do you mean with "INVITE as LB and Failover Solution"?

-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc at aliax.net>