[OpenSIPS-Users] No solution with asterisk possible? New feature in TM? Re: parallel forking and CANCEL/BYE

[Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana]

On Friday 23 October 2009 11:25:57 Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> El Viernes, 23 de Octubre de 2009, Uwe Kastens escribió:
> > Hi,
> >
> > > IMHO a proxy shouldn't behave as a UAC. Perhaps it can monitor dialogs
> > > and so because this features just requires requests inspection, there
> > > is no intrusion (adding a Record-Route parameter is not intrusion XD).
> > > But behaving as an UAC is 100% intrusion.
> > >
> > > Yes, OpenSIPS is very flexible and can be used to solve some UA
> > > problems, but the proxy shouldn't be the key for this purpose (IMHO).
> >
> > Ok. I am with you.
> >
> > But for example looking at the problem with mediaproxy (see email from
> > this morning), opensips is doing to much or to less ATM. So
> > mediaproxy/opensips will talk to the wrong SDP Ports, since its using
> > the 2nd 200 OK with SDP from the UAC answer.
>
> Yes, I've replied to that mail right now. It seems to be a bug in
> mediaproxy.

No, it's not a bug in mediaproxy. I think it's a bug in engage_media_proxy(), 
I'm pretty sure ... because I use mediaproxy with parallel forking without 
any problem on the same scenario, but using use_mediaproxy 

-- 
Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana
Dimensión Virtual