[OpenSIPS-Users] No solution with asterisk possible? New feature in TM? Re: parallel forking and CANCEL/BYE

[Uwe Kastens]

Hi,

After reading lots of docs and mailing lists, it looks like there is now
solution for asterisk available and looks like that might be a long way
till then.

Maybe its possible to implement that feature in TM?


http://www.codename-pineapple.org/doc/html/sip3_dialog_match.html

BR

Uwe




Iñaki Baz Castillo schrieb:
> El Jueves, 22 de Octubre de 2009, Uwe Kastens escribió:
>>> I don 't understand... first you said that the GW send a call to OpenSIPS
>>> and OpenSIPS to both AST1 and AST2 (Asterisk). And the problem is in the
>>> GW because ignores the second 200.
>>> Am I wrong?
>> The setup is:
>> asterisk(gw) <opensips> ast1+ast2
>>
>> No, you are right. So I need to fix that problem on the asterisk(gw) not
>> on AST1 and AST2.
> 
> ok ok.
> 
> I remember that Olle (chan_sip) commented that Asterisk was tested for this 
> scenario (receiving two 200 for INVITE) in a SIPit, but I don't remember the 
> results... :)
> 
> Of course, you should enable "pedantic=yes" so in this way Asterisk """"is 
> supposed" to match To/From tags also. However I would trust it too much...
> 


-- 

kiste lat: 54.322684, lon: 10.13586