[OpenSIPS-Users] Feature-request: AVPs for nat_traversal

[Brett Nemeroff]

Migration from nathelper? What's this you say?  :)

Can you for us "users" out here explain the implication of a new
"nathelper"? Is nat_traveral intended to replace nathelper?  What's new? Am
I jumping the gun asking these questions? :)

Thanks!
-Brett


On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan at voice-system.ro
> wrote:

> Dan, what about this? this will accelerate the migration from nathelper
> to nat_tranversal module, what do you say?
>
> As time as it is not technical nightmare (from implementation point of
> view), this feature make sense to me.
>
> Regards,
> Bogdan
>
> Thomas Gelf wrote:
> > I would also like to take occasion to propose a new feature: adding a
> > parameter named "keepalive_interval_avp", allowing to set individual
> > keepalive intervals for customers with special needs.
> >
> > Also "keepalive_method_avp" would be a useful addition. Both changes
> > would probably require modifications to keepalive_state_file and
> > corresponding internal structures, but I think this could be solved
> > in a backward-compatible manner.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Thomas Gelf
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Users mailing list
> > Users at lists.opensips.org
> > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20090611/24ae1445/attachment.htm