[OpenSIPS-Users] NATed REGISTERs are failing
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
bogdan at voice-system.ro
Thu Oct 30 11:52:04 CET 2008
Hi Iñaki,
Keep in mind that SER started before RFC3261 :) - and there are a lot of
things (like such params) that made sense in the pre RFC3261 world.
Now, I agree with your logic and I see no reason for having
"reply_to_via=1"
Maybe we can remove this option to avoid any further issues like this one.
Regards,
Bogdan
Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> El Miércoles, 29 de Octubre de 2008, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu escribió:
>
>> By any chance, do you have a "reply_to_via=1" in your config (in the
>> global parameter block) ?
>>
>
> But anyway... why should be Via sent-by be used to send the response?
> RFC 3261 says clearly that if a proxy receives a request in which Via sent-by
> differs from real source address, then "received=PUBLIC_IP" must be added to
> top Via.
> If the request is forwarded stateless, when the reply arrives it must be sent
> to the "received" address (if it exists).
>
> AFAIK "reply_to_via=1" is needed for implementing a stateless proxy with
> OpenSIPS, isn't it? But in that case, the responses must be sent
> to "received" address when present.
>
> Am I wrong?
>
>
More information about the Users
mailing list