[OpenSIPS-Users] Mediaproxy or RtpProxy

[Adrian Georgescu]

For MediaProxy1 you need one machine for each 200 active sessions. For  
MediaProxy 2 you can use one machine only. I cannot speak for RTP  
proxy, you have to ask their developers

Adrian


On Nov 27, 2008, at 2:51 PM, Woody Dickson wrote:

> Hi Adrian,
>
> Sorry, I don't mean to offense anyone when I incorrectly used the  
> term poorly.  Please accept my apology.
>
> I would like to use either MediaProxy or RtpProxy to proxy 1-2K  
> concurrent sessions.  Is this a realistic number for either one?
>
> Could someone comment on the performance, scalability, and ease-of- 
> use between the two?
>
> Thanks,
> Woody
>
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 8:54 PM, Adrian Georgescu <ag at ag- 
> projects.com> wrote:
> Woody,
>
> Statements that things behave poorly out of concrete context do not  
> really help anyone.
>
> The question is how many sessions to you want to handle? Can you  
> answer this simple question? Then someone might be able to help you.
>
> Adrian
>
>
> On Nov 27, 2008, at 1:46 PM, Woody Dickson wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am trying to decide on whether to use RtpProxy or MediaProxy for  
>> my current opensips implementation.  Previously MediaProxy was  
>> known to perform poorly under high loard.  Now with the latest 2.0  
>> release, does anyone know how does MediaProxy compare to RtpProxy  
>> in terms of performance, scalability, and ease-of-use?
>>
>> I would appreciate any insight on this.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Woody
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at lists.opensips.org
>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20081127/8aef8d0c/attachment.htm