[OpenSIPS-Users] RLS and presence Server
mahesh.peddi at info-spectrum.com
mahesh.peddi at info-spectrum.com
Mon Nov 3 12:00:18 CET 2008
Hi Anca,
Thankyou.
I have one some doubts regarding RLS..
1. What does
---------
modparam("rls", "integrated_xcap_server", 1)
------
means in the cfg file?
2. does RLS need openxcap to be running for RLS to work in the desired way?
Regards,
Mahesh Peddi
----- Original Message -----
From: "Anca Vamanu" <anca at voice-system.ro>
To: <mahesh.peddi at info-spectrum.com>
Cc: <users at lists.openser.org>
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2008 8:30 PM
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RLS and presence Server
> Hi Mahesh,
>
> I have made the port in 1.4.
> You don't need to change anything, but it is more efficient if you set the
> presence_server parameter to the address of the presence server:
> modparam("rls", "presence_server", "sip:sa at ip:port");
>
> regards,
> Anca
>
> mahesh.peddi at info-spectrum.com wrote:
>> Hi Anca,
>>
>> Thankyou very much.
>>
>> Can you please merge the changes to 1.4 branch? that will be helpful for
>> me :)
>>
>> With your changes in rls, Do I need to change anything in the
>> configuration file?
>> or just t_relay() to forward to presence server will suffice?
>>
>> Thankyou in advance.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Mahesh Peddi
>>
>>
>>> Hi Mahesh,,
>>>
>>> Could you please update RLS to the latest version in the latest version
>>> in the trunk( or if you like to the svn branch for 1.4 , as I will port
>>> the patch there also today). It has some quite important fixes .
>>> Using a separate presence server does work and with the script that you
>>> have printed - doing t_reply for requests that are for presence server.
>>> Also, with the version from svn, you can set the module parameter for
>>> rls module - presence_server to the address of your server and this way
>>> the presence requests generated by the rls server won't pass through the
>>> rls server.
>>>
>>> regards,
>>> Anca Vamanu
>>>
>>> mahesh.peddi at info-spectrum.com wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> I am able to see RLS properly working when RLS and presence
>>>> functionality is in the same server.
>>>>
>>>> after that, I tried to integrate RLS as a separate application server.
>>>>
>>>> To forward the message from RLS to presence server, I made below
>>>> changes in the config file:
>>>>
>>>> route[2]
>>>> {
>>>> if (!t_newtran())
>>>> {
>>>> sl_reply_error();
>>>> exit;
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> if(is_method("NOTIFY"))
>>>> {
>>>> rls_handle_notify();
>>>> t_release();
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> if(is_method("SUBSCRIBE"))
>>>> {
>>>> $var(ret_code)= rls_handle_subscribe();
>>>>
>>>> if($var(ret_code)== 10)
>>>> #to forward to presence server
>>>> t_relay("udp:<ip>:5070");
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> if(is_method("PUBLISH"))
>>>> {
>>>> #to forward to presence server.
>>>> t_relay("udp:<ip>:5070");
>>>> t_release();
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> exit;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> because of this configuration, i found two problems:
>>>>
>>>> 1. when i am forwarding subscribe message (from RLS to presence
>>>> server), its not sending the subscribe for all the contacts. Here, i
>>>> am expecting (sort of) output of rls_handle_subscribe() to be sent to
>>>> the presence server. Which is not happening.
>>>>
>>>> 2. When presence server is sending notify message, it is sending
>>>> directly to scscf..instead of rls..
>>>>
>>>> Can anybody let me know, how can I get the desired functionality of:
>>>>
>>>> 1. UE --> RLS --> presence server (subscribe)
>>>> 2. Presence server --> RLS --> UE (for notify).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If there is any other way to forward message from RLS to presence,
>>>> please let me know
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Mahesh Peddi
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Users mailing list
>>>> Users at lists.opensips.org
>>>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
More information about the Users
mailing list