<HTML><BODY><div>
<div>Hi list.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>I have a 2.4 full-sharing-cluster and trying to</div>
<div>make it as redundant as possible.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>So I configured </div>
<div> </div>
<div> modparam("usrloc", "working_mode_preset", "full-sharing-cachedb-cluster")</div>
<div> </div>
<div>and separate MongoDB to each OpenSIPS node:</div>
<div> </div>
<div> # node 1</div>
<div> modparam("usrloc", "cachedb_url", "mongodb://1.1.1.1:27017/opensipsDB.userlocation")</div>
<div> </div>
<div>
<div> # node 2</div>
<div> modparam("usrloc", "cachedb_url", "mongodb://2.2.2.2:27017/opensipsDB.userlocation")</div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div>And as I see, this is not the right way, because ‘opensipsctl fifo ul_dump’ shows nothing</div>
<div>in such architecture, though the REGISTER messages are handled correctly.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Everything is OK with ‘opensipsctl fifo ul_dump’ when I use the same MongoDB</div>
<div>for both OpenSIPS nodes.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>So the question is: should we use the same MongoDB in "full-sharing-cachedb-cluster" ?</div>
<div>Or it’s possible to use geographically distributed ones?</div>
</div>
<div> </div>
<div data-signature-widget="container">
<div data-signature-widget="content">
<div>-----------------------------------------------<br>
<span style="font-size: 15px;">BR, Alexey</span><br style="font-size: 15px;">
<span style="font-size: 15px;">http://alexeyka.zantsev.com/</span></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</BODY></HTML>