<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">Hi Vlad,<br><div><br></div><div>Thanks for the clarification.</div><div><br></div><div>OK - that makes sense.</div><div><br></div><div>I suppose this processed_dialogs value incrementing on the standby node is a good indicator that clustering and dialog syncing is working as expected.</div><div><br></div><div>Thank you.</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, 21 Oct 2019 at 13:30, Vlad Patrascu <<a href="mailto:vladp@opensips.org">vladp@opensips.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
  
    
  
  <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <p>The term "processed" should be read more generically in this
      context to include to act of receiving the replicated dialog and
      preparing it to become active at any time.<br>
    </p>
    <pre cols="72">Vlad Patrascu
OpenSIPS Developer
<a href="http://www.opensips-solutions.com" target="_blank">http://www.opensips-solutions.com</a></pre>
    <div>On 10/21/2019 02:57 PM, solarmon wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr"> Hi Vlad,
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>That was my understanding too, but why would
          processed_dialogs be incrementing on the standby (State=0)
          node?</div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <div class="gmail_quote">
        <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, 21 Oct 2019 at 12:51,
          Vlad Patrascu <<a href="mailto:vladp@opensips.org" target="_blank">vladp@opensips.org</a>> wrote:<br>
        </div>
        <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
          <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
            <p>Hi solarmon,<br>
            </p>
            <p>'failed_dialogs' and 'processed_dialogs' represent the
              total number of failed/processed dialogs on that OpenSIPS
              instance since startup. If one of the nodes has been
              running and handling traffic for a longer time, it's
              normal for the stats to be different. On the other hand
              'active_dialogs' should indeed be always in sync.<br>
            </p>
            <p>Regards,<br>
            </p>
            <pre cols="72">Vlad Patrascu
OpenSIPS Developer
<a href="http://www.opensips-solutions.com" target="_blank">http://www.opensips-solutions.com</a></pre>
            <div>On 10/21/2019 01:07 PM, solarmon wrote:<br>
            </div>
            <blockquote type="cite">
              <div dir="ltr">Hi,<br>
                <div><br>
                </div>
                <div>Are dialogs stats meant to be totally synced
                  between to openSIPS nodes in a cluster - i.e. when
                  using clusterer?</div>
                <div><br>
                </div>
                <div>I am monitoring/graphing the active_dialogs,
                  failed_dialogs and processed_dialogs for each node,
                  using 'opensipsctl fifo get_statistics' and they are
                  not fully synced:</div>
                <div>              </div>
                <div><b>Node 1:</b></div>
                <div>active_dialogs = 6</div>
                <div>failed_dialogs = 175</div>
                <div>processed_dialogs = 605<br>
                </div>
                <div><br>
                </div>
                <div><b>Node 2:</b></div>
                <div>
                  <div>active_dialogs = 6</div>
                  <div>failed_dialogs = 0</div>
                  <div>processed_dialogs = 430</div>
                </div>
                <div><br>
                </div>
                <div>It seems active_dialogs is synced, but
                  failed_dialogs and processed_dialogs are not.</div>
                <div><br>
                </div>
                <div>processed_dialogs figures are increasing on both,
                  but they are not synced.<br>
                </div>
                <div><br>
                </div>
                <div>Please can somebody explain and/or confirm this
                  behaviour.</div>
                <div><br>
                </div>
                <div>Thanks</div>
                <div><br>
                </div>
              </div>
              <br>
              <fieldset></fieldset>
              <br>
              <pre>_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
<a href="mailto:Users@lists.opensips.org" target="_blank">Users@lists.opensips.org</a>
<a href="http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users" target="_blank">http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users</a>
</pre>
            </blockquote>
            <br>
          </div>
          _______________________________________________<br>
          Users mailing list<br>
          <a href="mailto:Users@lists.opensips.org" target="_blank">Users@lists.opensips.org</a><br>
          <a href="http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users</a><br>
        </blockquote>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre>_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
<a href="mailto:Users@lists.opensips.org" target="_blank">Users@lists.opensips.org</a>
<a href="http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users" target="_blank">http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </div>

_______________________________________________<br>
Users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Users@lists.opensips.org" target="_blank">Users@lists.opensips.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users</a><br>
</blockquote></div></div>