<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.E-mailStijl17
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="NL" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US">I’ve been using the hash over call-id for a long time, and distribution has been pretty even over all destinations.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt;line-height:12.75pt"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">Met vriendelijke groet,<br>
<br>
</span><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#84C41B">Rik Broers</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"><br>
</span><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#212735">Voice Engineer</span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">Van:</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"> users-bounces@lists.opensips.org [mailto:users-bounces@lists.opensips.org]
<b>Namens </b>Gunjan Korlekar<br>
<b>Verzonden:</b> woensdag 2 maart 2016 5:26<br>
<b>Aan:</b> OpenSIPS users mailling list <users@lists.opensips.org><br>
<b>Onderwerp:</b> Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Dispatcher algorithm question<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:9.5pt">Hi Olle,</span><span lang="EN-US"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:9.5pt">Thanks for your reply. I will review my script for the re transmission of invites issue.</span><span lang="EN-US"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:9.5pt">But in the meanwhile can someone answer my question regarding the 'hash over call-id' algorithm?</span><span lang="EN-US"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:9.5pt">Thanks,</span><span lang="EN-US"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:9.5pt">Gunjan</span><span lang="EN-US"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:9.5pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:9.5pt">> On 29 Feb 2016, at 18:58, Gunjan Korlekar <</span><a href="mailto:gunjan@switch.co"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:9.5pt">gunjan@switch.co</span></a><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:9.5pt">>
wrote:<br>
><br>
> Hello,<br>
><br>
> I have a dispatcher table with about 10 destinations and was using the round-robin algorithm to route to destinations since we wanted to have an even spread of traffic across the destinations. However I recently observed that with the round-robin, re-INVITEs
with the same call id get routed to different destinations which we thought the dispatcher would handle. So we figured that if we want to circumvent this problem we need to use the hash over call-id algorithm.<br>
><br>
> Does the 'hash over call-id' give a fair way of distributing the calls over different destinations in the dispatcher like the round robin so that the traffic is spread evenly over the destinations?<br>
> Is there a way we can combine the two algorithms for one set of destinations?<br>
<br>
Re-invites are in-dialog and should not be handled with dispatcher normally. Dispatcher is used to dialog-forming requests only. I would like to suggest you review your script.<br>
<br>
</span><span style="font-size:9.5pt">/O</span><br clear="all">
<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal">-- <o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Thanks,<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Gunjan<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>