<div dir="ltr">Anyone has thoughts on this?.If i use record routing instead of topology hiding would it help?.<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 10:47 AM, John Nash <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:john.nash778@gmail.com" target="_blank">john.nash778@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div><div>Dear Vlad,<br><br></div>Do you need any more information? Like debug log or complete wireshark pcap?<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br><br></font></span></div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">John<br></font></span></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote"><span class="">On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:06 PM, John Nash <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:john.nash778@gmail.com" target="_blank">john.nash778@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br></span><div><div class="h5"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div><div>I am using opensips 2.1 with topology_hiding module. I have an issue only with one SIP endpoint. This endpoint sends Ack message (after 200 OK to Invite) without any to tag because of that it is not matching with In dialog request section.<br><br></div>Can a UA send ACK without to tag?...If yes any way I can match it with ongoing dialog?<span><font color="#888888"><br><br></font></span></div><span><font color="#888888">John<br></font></span></div>
</blockquote></div></div></div><br></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>