<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Stun/Turn/Ice are usefull where Client
is behind a NAT and OpenSIPS has public IP.<br>
You could use nathelper modules instead of Stun, to set the right
IPs in the messages from client.<br>
If OpenSIPS is behind a NAT too (it has private IP) you must use
RTPProxy too with a proper configuration.<br>
<br>
<br>
Il 29/08/2015 17:47, Nabeel ha scritto:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CA+vx6KJfi=vzv44nL4JmRtUd36U+ZH2EU_YwkLa2dfu3EzLRkQ@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<p dir="ltr">Hi, </p>
<p dir="ltr">I would like to know which is more effective for NAT
traversal, rtpproxy or STUN/TURN/ICE implementation.</p>
<p dir="ltr">I heard that TURN server with one public IP can
function equivalent to rtpproxy, and TURN server with two public
IPs is more effective than rtpproxy. </p>
<p dir="ltr">Is that true? </p>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Users@lists.opensips.org">Users@lists.opensips.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users">http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>