<div dir="ltr"><div><div>Hello Bogdan,<br><br></div>This issue is solved. It turned out to be my config issue. I was stripping some headers in initial Invite while in case of Reinvite I passed them as it is and that broke something at gateway.<br><br></div><div>But I am facing a real issue which i cannot get past. I sent another mail by subject &quot;Ack without To tag&quot;. Once convenient please check that.<br></div><div><br></div>John<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:bogdan@opensips.org" target="_blank">bogdan@opensips.org</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
  
    
  
  <div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <tt>Hi John,<br>
      <br>
      So you have a SIP capture (full call) to show the re-INVITE
      problem ? Otherwise it is hard to figure out what is going on
      there.<br>
      <br>
      Regards,<br>
    </tt><span class="">
    <pre cols="72">Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
<a href="http://www.opensips-solutions.com" target="_blank">http://www.opensips-solutions.com</a></pre>
    </span><div><div class="h5"><div>On 15.06.2015 22:08, John Nash wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div>
          <div>
            <div>
              <div>Hello Bogdan,<br>
                <br>
              </div>
              Thank you I will just ignore them. I have one more related
              issue. I am using uac_replace_from in auto mode along with
              topology_hiding. In a case when UA sends opensips a
              REInvite , my end carrier seem to completely ignore the
              Reinvite. I noticed that From URI in original Invite is
              different from the one sent in Reinvite (Only change is
              caller ID)....<br>
              <br>
            </div>
            Is there something I should know when mixing topology_hiding
            function and uac_replace_from?<br>
            <br>
          </div>
          Regards<br>
          <br>
        </div>
        John<br>
        <div>
          <div>
            <div><br>
              <br>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
      <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        <div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 9:57 PM,
          Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:bogdan@opensips.org" target="_blank">bogdan@opensips.org</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
            <div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"> <tt>Hi </tt><tt>John,</tt><tt><br>
                <br>
                The module complains of receiving in Early state a reply
                without &quot;tag&quot; param in TO header - something like that
                is bogus.<br>
              </tt><tt><br>
              </tt><tt>Best regards,</tt><br>
              <pre cols="72">Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
<a href="http://www.opensips-solutions.com" target="_blank">http://www.opensips-solutions.com</a></pre>
              <div>
                <div>
                  <div>On 15.06.2015 12:32, John Nash wrote:<br>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </div>
              <blockquote type="cite">
                <div>
                  <div>
                    <div dir="ltr">
                      <div>
                        <div>
                          <div>
                            <div>I have modified my proxy config to
                              support topology_hiding function of dialog
                              module. But I see lot of dialog related
                              errors like ..<br>
                              <br>
                              ERROR:dialog:push_reply_in_dialog: [487]
                              reply in dlg state [2]: missing TAG param
                              in TO hdr<br>
                              ERROR:dialog:w_validate_dialog: null
                              dialog<br>
                              <br>
                            </div>
                            I am just wondering if my configuration is
                            correct. How functions like loose_route();
                            match_dialog();, Validate_dialog(),
                            fix_route_dialog should be used in
                            production environment to cover all cases.<br>
                            <br>
                          </div>
                          From documentation I find code snippets
                          explaining application for each function but
                          how they all work together in topology_hiding
                          function scenario?<br>
                          <br>
                        </div>
                        PS: I can send my config in case someone needs
                        to have a look.<br>
                        <br>
                      </div>
                      John<br>
                      <div>
                        <div>
                          <div><br>
                          </div>
                        </div>
                      </div>
                    </div>
                    <br>
                    <fieldset></fieldset>
                    <br>
                  </div>
                </div>
                <pre>_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
<a href="mailto:Users@lists.opensips.org" target="_blank">Users@lists.opensips.org</a>
<a href="http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users" target="_blank">http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users</a>
</pre>
              </blockquote>
              <br>
            </div>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
        <br>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </div></div></div>

</blockquote></div><br></div>