<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=windows-1251"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;"><div>Hello. Would you please let us know how failure and reply routes are performed? In parallel or sequentially? If sequentially, in what order? And is it possible to influence this order?</div><div><br></div><div>For instance regarding the route shown below, when in reply to INVITE we get 401 or 407, both routes are activated, and judging by log the route t_on_reply is called first and then the route t_on_failure. Is it really so and are they performed one after another?</div><div> </div><div>route[dispatch_out] {</div><div> ...</div><div> t_on_failure("rtf_dispatch_out");</div><div> t_on_reply("auth_reply");</div><div> t_relay();</div><div> exit;</div><div>}</div><div><br></div><div>Thank you very much. Have a nice day.</div><div><br></div><div>
<div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;"><br><br>Timofeev Dmitry<br>VoIP Engineer<br>Linux, Asterisk, Freeswitch, Cisco solutions<br>Skype: itsroot<br>icq: 227227933<br><br><br></div>
</div>
<br></body></html>