<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><tt>Hi Nick,<br>
        <br>
        Use also the "f" flag (to ignore the indication of another rtpp
        in the message) - Razvan made a point in spotting the
        "a=nortpproxy:yes" in the incoming 183 reply.<br>
        <br>
        Regards,<br>
      </tt>
      <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.opensips-solutions.com">http://www.opensips-solutions.com</a></pre>
      On 30.06.2014 21:17, Nick Cameo wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CAGWRaZbKjE1uJb8jzvigpn9ajDqSih3gjhTT6G561HFWT7p6ig@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div>Hello Bogdan, I am not sure what autobridging is however,
          this is our architecture:</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>SIP Server 192.168.2.20</div>
        <div>RTPProxy Server 192.168.2.5</div>
        <div>Outside IP (Changed for Security): 77.71.33.152</div>
        <div>Origination Carrier (Changed for Security): 333.444.555.666</div>
        <div>Termination Carrier (Changed for Security): 222.11.22.33</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>We start RTPProxy using the following command:</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>/usr/local/rtpproxy/bin/rtpproxy -s udp:<a
            moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://192.168.2.5:7789">192.168.2.5:7789</a>
          -l <a moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="http://192.168.2.5/77.71.33.152">192.168.2.5/77.71.33.152</a>
          -m 8000 -M 65535 -u root root -F -d INFO LOG_LOCAL0</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>RTPProxy Related Script in OpenSIPS Configuration:</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>modparam("rtpproxy", "rtpproxy_sock", "udp:<a
            moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://192.168.2.5:7789">192.168.2.5:7789</a>")</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>branch_route[1]</div>
        <div>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; xlog("L_INFO","New Branch For: $ru at IP: $si\n");</div>
        <div>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; if(has_body("application/sdp"))
          rtpproxy_offer("roc","77.71.33.152");</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>onreply_route[1]</div>
        <div>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; xlog("L_INFO","Incoming Reply Route: From=$fu,
          To=$tu, RU=$ru, CI=$ci IP=$si\n");</div>
        <div>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; if(has_body("application/sdp"))
          rtpproxy_answer("roc","192.168.2.5");</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>I have attached three documents which contain the related
          slice</div>
        <div>for the problematic call in question:</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>[i] SIP Trace</div>
        <div>[ii] RTP Trace</div>
        <div>
          [iii] RTP Proxy log</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div style="">Not on [iii], as you know there are two sessions
          per call. The first has packets relayed from both</div>
        <div style="">caller and callee for the inbound part. The second
          session (ie, outbound) has 0 packets relayed</div>
        <div style="">because the firewall is burning the packets both
          ways.</div>
        <div style=""><br>
        </div>
        <div style="">Not to sound redundant, this is one of the very
          few cases where we experience such problems.</div>
        <div style="">All other calls work as expected under the same
          environment.</div>
        <div style=""><br>
        </div>
        <div style="">Thanks in Advance,</div>
        <div style=""><br>
        </div>
        <div style="">Nick.</div>
        &#8203;</div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>