<div dir="ltr">Rik,<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>My deployment is not dependant on virtual IP. Since the failover and load balancing logic resides on the client and I intend to use srv records to define the weight of proxies. The problem comes to surface if a user makes an attempt to register and finds himself on server A. Soon after makes an attempt to register and finds the second client on server b. If a Ruri request sources from server B how can I fork the request in parallel to the first entry in server A?</div>
<div>Thanks for your reply but I have raised the question of using contact replication before please see below:<br></div><div><br></div><div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">---------- Forwarded message ----------<br>From: <b class="gmail_sendername">Liviu Chircu</b> <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:liviu@opensips.org">liviu@opensips.org</a>></span><br>
Date: Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 1:29 PM<br>Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] binary replication<br>To: <a href="mailto:users@lists.opensips.org">users@lists.opensips.org</a><br><br><br><div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><div><tt>Hello Tito,<br>
<br>Both dialog and user location replication were actually designed to work with VIPs only! From the moment the "receiving" instance takes over, it should have the same pool of registered users as instance #1, and it should be able to process all existing dialogues.<br>
<br>Best regards,<br></tt><pre cols="72">Liviu Chircu
OpenSIPS Developer
<a href="http://www.opensips-solutions.com/" target="_blank">http://www.opensips-solutions.com</a></pre><div><div class="h5">On 06/11/2014 03:27 PM, Tito Cumpen wrote:<br></div></div></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div class="h5">
<div dir="ltr">Group,<div><br></div><div>Playing with the idea of using binary replication. Just curious if anyone can provide a use case. Would this coupled with a virtual ip? I am not certain how the instance that accepts replications would take over.</div>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Thanks,</div><div>Tito</div></div><br><fieldset></fieldset><br></div></div><pre>_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
<a href="mailto:Users@lists.opensips.org" target="_blank">Users@lists.opensips.org</a>
<a href="http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users" target="_blank">http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users</a>
</pre></blockquote><br></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>Users mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Users@lists.opensips.org">Users@lists.opensips.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users" target="_blank">http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users</a></div>
</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 5:35 AM, Rik Broers <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:RBroers@motto.nl" target="_blank">RBroers@motto.nl</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div lang="NL" link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">I’m was also looking into this problem, which is very similar to yours.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">I found this and it is a perfect solution to my problem.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">Think this would help you too.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""><a href="http://www.opensips.org/html/docs/modules/devel/usrloc#usrloc-replication" target="_blank">http://www.opensips.org/html/docs/modules/devel/usrloc#usrloc-replication</a><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt;line-height:12.75pt"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">Vriendelijke groet,<br>
<br>
<b><span style="color:#84c41b">Rik Broers</span></b><br>
</span><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#212735">Voice Engineer</span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""><br>
<br>
</span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">Van:</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""> <a href="mailto:users-bounces@lists.opensips.org" target="_blank">users-bounces@lists.opensips.org</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:users-bounces@lists.opensips.org" target="_blank">users-bounces@lists.opensips.org</a>]
<b>Namens </b>Tito Cumpen<br>
<b>Verzonden:</b> dinsdag 24 juni 2014 04:54<br>
<b>Aan:</b> OpenSIPS users mailling list<br>
<b>Onderwerp:</b> [OpenSIPS-Users] Distributed deployment<u></u><u></u></span></p><div><div class="h5">
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Hello group,<u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">I am reaching out to you because I am hitting a roadblock in designing a distributed deployment. Currently I am entertaining the idea of using DNS srv for the sake of load balancing and availability. The main problem is sharing aors among
the proxies. My requirement is to allow proxies to fork requests to remote proxies in which a user could be registered to in addition to the local server. The binary replication component will not suffice because it is tailored to virtual ip. I've noticed
that opensips has a recursive timer that runs at every second to verify which registration expires with the intent of removing it. Assuming a shared mysql instance is the only option each proxy will be querying mysql which seems like a ton of activity. Can
anyone advise what the best practice for scaling would be?<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Thanks,<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Tito<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
</div></div></div>
</div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Users@lists.opensips.org">Users@lists.opensips.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users" target="_blank">http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>