<div dir="ltr"><div>Bogdan,</div><div><br></div>Thanks for the advice. Although it might be a long shot, I hope acc module can handle something like this in the future. I guess I'll just try to adjust/increase the fr_inv_timer_avp value for now to minimize this scenario.<div>
<br></div><div>Cheers!</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 8:24 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bogdan@opensips.org" target="_blank">bogdan@opensips.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><u></u>
<div text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<tt>Hi Ronald,<br>
<br>
I wouldn't go so far - even if you get 2 records for the
transaction based accounting, the values will be mixed.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
</tt><div class="im">
<pre cols="72">Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
<a href="http://www.opensips-solutions.com" target="_blank">http://www.opensips-solutions.com</a></pre>
<br></div><div><div class="h5">
On 07/10/2013 03:08 PM, Ronald Cepres wrote:
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">Bogdan,
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I am currently using CDR based. Does it mean that if I use
transaction based, we will have more accurate resulting CDRs?</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Thanks.</div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra">
<br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 10:05 PM,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bogdan@opensips.org" target="_blank">bogdan@opensips.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff"> <tt>Hi Ronald,<br>
<br>
I never experienced such race (with multiple 200 oks on
different branches)....But depending on what kind of
accounting you do:<br>
- transaction based = you will get 2 START records and
2 STOP records, but with different TO tags....<br>
- cdr based = you will get the values of the last 200
OK (which will overwrite the values of the first one)..<br>
<br>
I guess the ACC module was never designed to deal with
such scenarios.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
</tt>
<div>
<pre cols="72">Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
<a href="http://www.opensips-solutions.com" target="_blank">http://www.opensips-solutions.com</a></pre>
<br>
</div>
<div>
<div> On 07/06/2013 02:25 AM, Ronald Cepres
wrote:
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">Bogdan,
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Understood, and thanks for the info.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>However, I have some concerns with regards to
the resulting CDR using the acc and drouting
modules. I think if both GWs sent 200 OK at the
same time, it would result in a CDR with the
values of AVPs specified by carrier_id_avp
and gw_id_avp drouting parameters set only to
GW2. Also, if GW1 is the last GW in the gwlist
and this type of race condition happens, the
value of the AVPs will be set to blank.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at
2:15 AM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bogdan@opensips.org" target="_blank">bogdan@opensips.org</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff"> <tt>Hello
Ronald,<br>
<br>
If the first GW sent any reply before
the timeout, than OpenSIPS will cancel
it before hitting the failure route. If
no reply at all sent by GW1, OpenSIPS
will hit the failure route on timeout
without canceling. If after this point
(call send to GW2) first GW sends a
reply :<br>
1) if a provisional reply (<200),
it will be canceled on the spot<br>
2) if a 200 ok reply -> it will
be accepted and fwd to calling device<br>
a) if the GW2 did not send a 200
OK, it will be canceled<br>
b) if GW2 also sent a 200 OK in
the same time, both 200 OK will be sent
to calling device and it that device
will decide what call to keep<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
</tt>
<div>
<pre cols="72">Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
<a href="http://www.opensips-solutions.com" target="_blank">http://www.opensips-solutions.com</a></pre>
<br>
</div>
<div>
<div> On 07/04/2013 07:41 PM, Ronald
Cepres wrote:
<blockquote type="cite">
<p dir="ltr">Bogdan,</p>
<p dir="ltr">Thanks for the
informative reply. </p>
<p dir="ltr">What I really want to
solve is a problem I encounter
when the first GW doesnt respond
after a defined timeout then
Opensips does failover to next GW.
A few seconds after the call is
routed to second GW, the first GW
responds with 200 OK, which may
cause problems. It seems that the
first GW has a slow response time.</p>
<p dir="ltr">The solution I am
thinking of to prevent this is to
send a cancel to the first GW
before doing failover to next
gateway. Does this make sense or
is there a better solution?</p>
<p dir="ltr">Thanks.</p>
<p dir="ltr">-Ronald</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Jul 4,
2013 11:58 PM, "Bogdan-Andrei
Iancu" <<a href="mailto:bogdan@opensips.org" target="_blank">bogdan@opensips.org</a>>
wrote:<br type="attribution">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff"> <tt>Hello
Ronald,<br>
<br>
When you hit the failure
route, there is no ongoing
branch left (doesn't matter
how many you previously
created) - so you should not
worry about this.<br>
<br>
By SIP definition, a
transaction fails (and
OpenSIPS gets into failure
route) only when all
branches failed.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
</tt>
<pre cols="72">Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
<a href="http://www.opensips-solutions.com" target="_blank">http://www.opensips-solutions.com</a></pre>
<br>
On 07/03/2013 10:43 PM, Ronald
Cepres wrote:
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">Hi all,
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Is there a way I can
cancel a pending branch
before doing a fail-over
to next gateway (due to
timeout from previous
gateway)? This way I can
make sure that the call
to the previous gateway
will not go through
anymore after fail-over
to the next gateway,
thus preventing us
"double-charged"
situations if the
previous gateway and the
new gateway both
answered the call. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Thanks in advance.</div>
<div>
<div><br clear="all">
<div><br>
</div>
-- <br>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
<div>Regards,</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Ronald</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<pre><fieldset></fieldset>
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
<a href="mailto:Users@lists.opensips.org" target="_blank">Users@lists.opensips.org</a>
<a href="http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users" target="_blank">http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<br clear="all">
<div><br>
</div>
-- <br>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
<div>Regards,</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Ronald Cepres</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<br clear="all">
<div><br>
</div>
-- <br>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
Ronald Cepres<br>
Network Operations Center<br>
Net Voip Communications, Inc.<br>
<br>
<br>
This message contains confidential information and is intended
only<br>
for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee
you<br>
should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please
notify<br>
the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this
e-mail by<br>
mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail
transmission<br>
cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information
could<br>
be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or
incomplete,<br>
or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept
liability for<br>
any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which
arise<br>
as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is
required please<br>
request a hard-copy version. Net Voip Communications, Inc.,
2721<br>
Forsyth Rd #256, Winter park, FL 32792. <a href="http://www.netvoipcommunications.com/" style="color:rgb(17,85,204)" target="_blank">www.netvoipcommunications.com</a><br>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div></div></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Users@lists.opensips.org">Users@lists.opensips.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users" target="_blank">http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div dir="ltr"><br><div>Regards,</div><div><br></div><div>Ronald Cepres</div><div><br></div></div>
</div>