<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Hi,<br>
<br>
I am not sure about record-routing in combination with failover of
drouting. Maybe someone knows for sure :)<br>
<br>
If i got a configuration where i am record_routing on inital invite,
but later there is a failover (use_next_gw() returns true) and the
call is sent to the next gateway. But the serial forked call (second
INVITE) is missing the Record-route header?<br>
<br>
<br>
Does this mean i just have to explicitly call record routing again
on failover? But to me it seems like this can't be right, or is this
correct/expected behaviour?<br>
<br>
<code>
<pre>if (use_next_gw()) {
...
record_route();
</pre>
</code>}<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Best Regards<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Max Mühlbronner
42com Telecommunication GmbH
Straße der Pariser Kommune 12-16
10243 Berlin
E-Mail: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:mm@42com.com">mm@42com.com</a>
Web: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.42com.com">www.42com.com</a>
Firmenangaben/Company information:
Handelsregister/Commercial register: Amtsgericht Berlin HRB 99071 B
Umsatzsteuer-ID/VAT-ID: DE223812306
Geschäftsführer/CEO: Thomas Reinig, Alexander Reinig
Diese E-Mail enthält Informationen von 42com Telecommunication GmbH. Diese sind möglicherweise vertraulich und ausschließlich für den Adressaten bestimmt. Sollten Sie diese elektronische Nachricht irrtümlicherweise erhalten haben, so informieren Sie uns bitte unverzüglich telefonisch oder per E-Mail.
This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you have received this message by mistake, please notify us immediately.
</pre>
</body>
</html>