<p>Load balancing is the same in both. <br>
What I was saying is that in some networks you may find the need to use both. I was not suggesting that you need to do that. Each has a slightly different subset of modules outside the that each developer made after the split. So potentially you would have a case where one module that you absolutely need is not available in the version your using</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Aug 15, 2011 8:52 AM, "Nick Khamis" <<a href="mailto:symack@gmail.com">symack@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution">> Hello Everyone,<br>> <br>> Thank you all for your responses,<br>
> <br>> David: The topology hiding feature looks interesting, will defiantly<br>> follow up on it. In terms of running both solutions on the same<br>> network, we would rather stick with one that offers most of what we<br>
> are looking for....<br>> <br>> Mark: No need for flame wars, it's always good to keep the user<br>> community in mind.<br>> <br>> In terms of high availability and more importantly load balancing, do<br>
> both projects use the same implementation?<br>> <br>> Thanks in Advance,<br>> <br>> Nick<br>> <br>> _______________________________________________<br>> Users mailing list<br>> <a href="mailto:Users@lists.opensips.org">Users@lists.opensips.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users">http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users</a><br></div>