<HTML dir=ltr><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=unicode">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6001.18148" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV id=idOWAReplyText30551 dir=ltr>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Verdana color=#000000 size=2>I deceided not to use a loadbalancer because, the IP address for outbound call would have been different and we want it to be completely transparent for existing Interco.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Verdana color=#000000 size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Verdana color=#000000 size=2>I went with heartbeat + mon </FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Verdana size=2>I created sip.monitor</FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Verdana size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Verdana size=2>When the fail over take effect it is not listening on the virtual IP, how do I configure opensips to bind to 0.0.0.0:5060 ?</FONT></DIV></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><BR>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>From:</B> users-bounces@lists.opensips.org on behalf of Nigel Daniels<BR><B>Sent:</B> Tue 26/01/2010 11:45 PM<BR><B>To:</B> OpenSIPS users mailling list<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] high-availability - senario<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV><BR>have you considerd using keepalived with vrrp instead ?<BR><BR>
<DIV class=gmail_quote>On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 7:03 AM, Julien Chavanton <SPAN dir=ltr><<A href="mailto:jc@atlastelecom.com">jc@atlastelecom.com</A>></SPAN> wrote:<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=gmail_quote style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: rgb(204,204,204) 1px solid">
<DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana color=#000000 size=2>I am configuring high-availability with heart-beat + LVS + ldirector</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2>I do not want to load balance but mostly make sure it will fail over quickly, I have found situation where the in LVS (UDP/TCP) connection never timeout when the remote IP send periodic OPTIONS request for example.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2>I beleive I will have to set very low UDP/TCP time-out, however with such a low time-out I can not load-balance so I will use w</FONT><FONT face=Verdana size=2>eighted Round-Robin with very high priority 65535 on the active one and weith 1 on the passive server.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2>Any other suggested way to cluster without load-balancing ?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></DIV><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>Users mailing list<BR><A href="mailto:Users@lists.opensips.org">Users@lists.opensips.org</A><BR><A href="http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users" target=_blank>http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users</A><BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV><BR><BR clear=all><BR>-- <BR>Nigel Daniels<BR>Network & Systems Administrator <BR>ConnectAndSell inc.<BR>(650)-533-2542 <BR><BR></DIV></BODY></HTML>