<br>have you considerd using keepalived with vrrp instead ?<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 7:03 AM, Julien Chavanton <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jc@atlastelecom.com">jc@atlastelecom.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div>
<div><font color="#000000" face="Verdana" size="2">I am configuring high-availability with heart-beat + LVS + ldirector</font></div>
<div><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"></font> </div>
<div><font face="Verdana" size="2">I do not want to load balance but mostly make sure it will fail over quickly, I have found situation where the in LVS (UDP/TCP) connection never timeout when the remote IP send periodic OPTIONS request for example.</font></div>
<div><font face="Verdana" size="2"></font> </div>
<div><font face="Verdana" size="2">I beleive I will have to set very low UDP/TCP time-out, however with such a low time-out I can not load-balance so I will use w</font><font face="Verdana" size="2">eighted Round-Robin with very high priority 65535 on the active one and weith 1 on the passive server.</font></div>
<div><font face="Verdana" size="2"></font> </div>
<div><font face="Verdana" size="2">Any other suggested way to cluster without load-balancing ?</font></div>
<div> </div></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>
Users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Users@lists.opensips.org">Users@lists.opensips.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users" target="_blank">http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Nigel Daniels<br>Network & Systems Administrator <br>ConnectAndSell inc.<br>(650)-533-2542 <br><br>