For what it's worth...<div>I've ran across tons of providers that don't like the To URI not matching the R-URI. And yes, it's ridiculous and it means they don't have a clue what they are doing.</div><div>
<br></div><div>You can use an actual B2BUA (sippy for example) to get around these restrictions if you can't otherwise make them route things properly. I wonder if the B2BUA module thats been discussed will accommodate this need. Rather than dismiss the broken carrier and saying to leave them, I'd like to find a way to address this issue.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Of course, that simply enables carriers to continue to operate their broken switches without fixing them.. So I'm not sure what's better. ;)</div><div>-Brett</div><div><br></div><div><br><div class="gmail_quote">
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Julien Chavanton <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jc@atlastelecom.com">jc@atlastelecom.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr"><font face="Verdana" color="#000000" size="2">Thank you for the clarification, maybe this partner does not support SIP Proxy, unfortunatly we will have to deal with them, we can not drop them.</font></div>
<div dir="ltr"><font face="Verdana" size="2"></font> </div>
<div dir="ltr"><font face="Verdana" size="2">not sure how to deal with this, diaplan ? </font><font face="Verdana" size="2"> :-(</font> </div></div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
<hr>
<font face="Tahoma" size="2"><b>From:</b> <a href="mailto:users-bounces@lists.opensips.org" target="_blank">users-bounces@lists.opensips.org</a> on behalf of Iñaki Baz Castillo<br><b>Sent:</b> Wed 29/07/2009 4:58 PM<br><b>Cc:</b> <a href="mailto:users@lists.opensips.org" target="_blank">users@lists.opensips.org</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Prefix and "To:" header field<br></font><br></div><div><div></div><div class="h5">
<div>
<p><font size="2">2009/7/29 Julien Chavanton <<a href="mailto:jc@atlastelecom.com" target="_blank">jc@atlastelecom.com</a>>:<br>> Drouting module do_routing(), does not modify the "To:" header field,<br>
> according to my reading this is ok, but it seems most softphone and sip node<br>> modify both<br>><br>> I have tested EyeBeam/X-Lite (dialplan prefixing)<br><br>When an *UA* generates an INVITE, both To URI and request URI must be equal.<br>
When a proxy *routes* an INVITE, it can modify the request URI, but<br>*never* the To URI.<br><br><br>> Our partner does not llike when the "To:" header field is different then the<br>> SIP INVITE, what is the suggested way of dealing with this ?<br>
<br>"Drop" your partner as it has no idea of SIP.<br><br><br>--<br>Iñaki Baz Castillo<br><<a href="mailto:ibc@aliax.net" target="_blank">ibc@aliax.net</a>><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>
Users mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Users@lists.opensips.org" target="_blank">Users@lists.opensips.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users" target="_blank">http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users</a><br>
</font></p></div></div></div></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>
Users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Users@lists.opensips.org">Users@lists.opensips.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users" target="_blank">http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>