Jeff,<div>Thanks for the feedback. I've been tempted to try out that edgemarc device.. Are you just using their edge box? I know they have some sort of device that does central stats collection as well.. Curious about that gizmo..</div>
<div>-Brett</div><div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 7:36 AM, Jeff Pyle <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jpyle@fidelityvoice.com">jpyle@fidelityvoice.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div>
<font face="Tahoma, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><span style="font-size:10pt">We’ve used Edgemarc router/ALGswith great success. I suppose this is a little different animal, however, as the standard method of configuration has the client register to its IP, passing through to the pre-configured proxy on the outside.<br>
<br>
There is a “transparent” mode that works much like the ALGs we all hate. No pre-configuration. While I won’t give it an absolute stamp of approval, I am definitely willing to declare it sucks much less than the average, useless ALG.<br>
<font color="#888888">
<br>
<br>
- Jeff</font><div class="im"><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
On 6/13/09 8:31 PM, "Brett Nemeroff" <<a href="http://brett@nemeroff.com" target="_blank">brett@nemeroff.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
</div></span></font><div class="im"><blockquote><font face="Tahoma, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><span style="font-size:10pt">Neat! Great Idea. I hate ALGs. BTW, Does anyone know of an ALG that actually works?<br>
</span></font></blockquote>
</div></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>