Hi Adrian,<br><br>Sorry, I don't mean to offense anyone when I incorrectly used the term poorly. Please accept my apology.<br><br>I would like to use either MediaProxy or RtpProxy to proxy 1-2K concurrent sessions. Is this a realistic number for either one?<br>
<br>Could someone comment on the performance, scalability, and ease-of-use between the two?<br><br>Thanks,<br>Woody<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 8:54 PM, Adrian Georgescu <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ag@ag-projects.com">ag@ag-projects.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div style="">Woody,<div><br></div><div>Statements that things behave poorly out of concrete context do not really help anyone. </div>
<div><br></div><div>The question is how many sessions to you want to handle? Can you answer this simple question? Then someone might be able to help you.</div><div><br></div><div>Adrian</div><div><br></div><div><br><div><div>
<div></div><div class="Wj3C7c"><div>On Nov 27, 2008, at 1:46 PM, Woody Dickson wrote:</div><br></div></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c"><div>Hi,</div> <div> </div> <div>I am trying to decide on whether to use RtpProxy or MediaProxy for my current opensips implementation. Previously MediaProxy was known to perform poorly under high loard. Now with the latest 2.0 release, does anyone know how does MediaProxy compare to RtpProxy in terms of performance, scalability, and ease-of-use? </div>
<div> </div> <div>I would appreciate any insight on this.</div> <div> </div> <div>Thanks,</div> <div>Woody</div></div></div> _______________________________________________<br>Users mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Users@lists.opensips.org" target="_blank">Users@lists.opensips.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users" target="_blank">http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users</a><br></blockquote></div><br></div></div></blockquote></div><br>