[OpenSIPS-Users] Nested reply_routes

[Richard Robson]

you call a reply route to handle the relpy. i.e. a positive outcome
200OK or a 183 etc. This reply should be relayed back to the originator
and there should be no need to call another reply route. it won't
expect a reply just an ack and that should be handled as an ACK and
relayed or an error sent back. (see the default script)
if you want the reply route to do something else then add a route to do
that or a branch route if needed. and call that from the reply route
(not nested)

Richard


On Wed, 2026-04-08 at 15:38 +0200, spce at lard.at wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> is it possible to use nested reply routes in opensips?
> 
> I want to clean up my script and thinking of something like this:
> > onreply_route[MAIN] {
> >  [...]
> >  is_from_gw(1) = t_on_reply("ADD_ISUP");> }
> >  [...] }
> >  onreply_route[ADD_ISUP] {
> >  add_isup_part() }
>  
> The nested onreply route then should return to the parent onreply
> route. In my tests I specifically had issues with the rtpengine
> module: when using rtpengine_answer in the parent onreply route and
> then calling another onreply route from parent route, opensips wasn't
> able to see the SDP body in the reply and the rtpengine_answer thus
> failed.
>  
> 
>  
> -- 
> Liebe Grüße / Kind regards,
> Malte
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20260408/557015dc/attachment-0001.html>