[OpenSIPS-Users] WARNING:rr:after_loose: no socket found to match 2nd RR
Richard Robson
richard at rikrobson.co.uk
Thu Aug 21 13:46:42 UTC 2025
Hi Walter.
you wll probably need to add the alias to make the warning dissapear.
it souns like you don't have the alias company1.sbc.mycompany.com
<http://company1.sbc.mycompany.com:5061> for the socket, so its
complaining, but the message is using the correct socket for egress from
the sound of it. This is what the new 3.6 feature addresses.
Regards.
Richard
On 21/08/2025 13:29, Andrew wrote:
> Hi, Walter
>
> Yes, companies are added in some other system so the list is dynamic
> and opensips here is only a SBC without connections to any outer
> database. Subdomain is passed in a custom header and pushed to
> Record-Route.
>
> I've done some more testing. There is also a problem with sequential
> requests from MS Teams in SIP-to-MS calls. They come with Route:
> company1.sbc.mycompany.com:5061
> <http://company1.sbc.mycompany.com:5061> Route hdr and loose_route
> throws ERROR "Different number of routes found in msg" because
> opensips doesn't detect domain company1.sbc.mycompany.com
> <http://company1.sbc.mycompany.com> as local. The problem can be
> resolved with the domain module by adding domains to a database.
> Unfortunately I will need to sync the domain list in this case.
>
> In the end I've found that those problems are solved in OpenSIPS 3.6.
> It has a new option ACCEPT_SUBDOMAIN on socket :). But I am not ready
> to move to 3.6 (3.4 is in use currently).
>
>
> чт, 21 авг. 2025 г. в 14:12, Walter Schober <walter.schober at neotel.at>:
>
> Hi Andrew!
>
> I guess the socket „company1.sbc.mycompany.com:5061“ is not known
> to opensips. Since there is no socket name alias (or is it
> meanwhile?) like in kamailio you will need to set the socket
> manually. Pls correct me, if Im wrong.
>
> br
> Walter
>
>> Am 21.08.2025 um 12:11 schrieb Andrew <andrey55555 at gmail.com>:
>>
>> Hi, all
>> I am working on an MS Teams SBC for multiple tenants.
>> I use OpenSIPS without topology hiding so I add Record-Route
>> headers. For each tenant I have to add its own domain like
>> company1.sbc.mycompany.com <http://company1.sbc.mycompany.com/>
>> and so on. Domains are correctly resolved to the same IP as
>> sbc.mycompany.com <http://sbc.mycompany.com/>. They should be
>> subdomains of sbc.mycompany.com <http://sbc.mycompany.com/> . The
>> main domain sbc.mycompany.com <http://sbc.mycompany.com/> should
>> also be added when receiving calls from MS so that they can send
>> us sequential requests (like BYE).
>> I use
>> record_route_preset("company1.sbc.mycompany.com:5061;transport=tls",
>> "LAN_IP:5060") for that as it's written here
>> https://blog.opensips.org/2019/09/16/opensips-as-ms-teams-sbc/
>> For calls from MS, I just change the order of the headers -
>> record_route_preset("LAN_IP:5060",
>> "sbc.mycompany.com:5061;transport=tls").
>> My calls work both ways but I receive the following warning
>> WARNING:rr:after_loose: no socket found to match 2nd RR after
>> doing loose_route() . What are the consequences of this warning?
>> I've already experienced one consequence: when I receive a BYE,
>> OpenSIPS doesn't set the socket_out variable, but the actual
>> packet is sent from the correct socket(or is it just luck?).
>> Should I set the socket manually?
>>
>> Best regards, Andrew.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at lists.opensips.org
>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20250821/8ae43ec3/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Users
mailing list